RFR: 8213890: Implementation of JEP 344: Abortable Mixed Collections for G1

[Kim Barrett]

> On Nov 27, 2018, at 3:32 PM, Thomas Schatzl <thomas.schatzl at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 15:19 -0500, Kim Barrett wrote:
>>> On Nov 27, 2018, at 2:36 PM, Stefan Johansson <
>>> stefan.johansson at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the review Kim,
>>> 
>>> Two new webrevs, I'll let you decide which way to go, I kind of
>>> prefer version b.
>>> Full a: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sjohanss/8213890/03a/
>>> Inc a:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sjohanss/8213890/02-03a/
>>> Full b: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sjohanss/8213890/03b/
>>> Inc b:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sjohanss/8213890/02-03b/
>> 
>> Version b looks good to me.
>> (I skimmed version a, but I also preferred b.)
>> 
> 
>  - in G1OopStarChunkedList::push, the increase of _used_memory can be
> moved out of the if- and else-blocks. :)

I don’t think so.  _used_memory shouldn’t be increased for the (implicit) case
of having an existing list that isn’t full.

> Do not need a re-review of that.
> 
> Variant b) looks good otherwise.
> 
> Thanks,
>  Thomas