RFR: 8223961: ZGC: Unexpected behaviour was observed caused by the incorrect update of _nticks in ZMetronome::wait_for_tick()
Jie Fu
fujie at loongson.cn
Thu May 16 09:21:32 UTC 2019
It's much clearer and more reasonable.
I like your patch.
Thanks Per.
On 2019/5/16 下午4:40, Per Liden wrote:
> On 05/16/2019 08:25 AM, Per Liden wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> There is code in ZStat that assumes ZMetronome::ntick() never skips
>> over ticks. That would need to be addressed if we do something like
>> this. Otherwise we risk not getting statistics print outs just
>> because the metronome overslept. I'll take a look at it.
>
> I was thinking something like this:
>
> diff --git a/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.cpp
> b/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.cpp
> --- a/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.cpp
> +++ b/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.cpp
> @@ -45,7 +45,9 @@
> _start_ms = TimeHelper::counter_to_millis(now.value());
> }
>
> - for (;;) {
> + MonitorLocker ml(&_monitor, Monitor::_no_safepoint_check_flag);
> +
> + while (!_stopped) {
> // We might wake up spuriously from wait, so always recalculate
> // the timeout after a wakeup to see if we need to wait again.
> const Ticks now = Ticks::now();
> @@ -53,15 +55,24 @@
> const uint64_t next_ms = _start_ms + (_interval_ms * _nticks);
> const int64_t timeout_ms = next_ms - now_ms;
>
> - MonitorLocker ml(&_monitor, Monitor::_no_safepoint_check_flag);
> - if (!_stopped && timeout_ms > 0) {
> + if (timeout_ms > 0) {
> // Wait
> ml.wait(timeout_ms);
> } else {
> // Tick
> - return !_stopped;
> + if (timeout_ms < -_interval_ms) {
> + // Missed one or more ticks. Bump _nticks accordingly to
> + // avoid firing a string of immediate ticks to make up
> + // for the ones we missed.
> + _nticks += -timeout_ms / _interval_ms;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> }
> }
> +
> + // Stopped
> + return false;
> }
>
> void ZMetronome::stop() {
> diff --git a/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.hpp
> b/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.hpp
> --- a/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.hpp
> +++ b/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.hpp
> @@ -29,11 +29,11 @@
>
> class ZMetronome : public StackObj {
> private:
> - Monitor _monitor;
> - const uint64_t _interval_ms;
> - uint64_t _start_ms;
> - uint64_t _nticks;
> - bool _stopped;
> + Monitor _monitor;
> + const int64_t _interval_ms;
> + uint64_t _start_ms;
> + uint64_t _nticks;
> + bool _stopped;
>
> public:
> ZMetronome(uint64_t hz);
> diff --git a/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zStat.cpp
> b/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zStat.cpp
> --- a/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zStat.cpp
> +++ b/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zStat.cpp
> @@ -850,7 +850,16 @@
> }
>
> bool ZStat::should_print(LogTargetHandle log) const {
> - return log.is_enabled() && (_metronome.nticks() %
> ZStatisticsInterval == 0);
> + static uint64_t print_at_nticks = ZStatisticsInterval;
> + uint64_t nticks = _metronome.nticks();
> +
> + if (nticks < print_at_nticks) {
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + print_at_nticks = ((nticks / ZStatisticsInterval) *
> ZStatisticsInterval) + ZStatisticsInterval;
> +
> + return log.is_enabled();
> }
>
> void ZStat::print(LogTargetHandle log, const ZStatSamplerHistory*
> history) const {
>
>
> cheers,
> Per
>
>>
>> cheers,
>> Per
>>
>> On 05/15/2019 04:33 PM, Jie Fu wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223961
>>>
>>> Please review the following patch which fixes the update of
>>> "_nticks" in ZMetronome::wait_for_tick()
>>> -----------------------------------
>>> diff -r b0b20413d853 src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.cpp
>>> --- a/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.cpp Wed May 15 11:53:47
>>> 2019 +0200
>>> +++ b/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.cpp Wed May 15 20:15:39
>>> 2019 +0800
>>> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@
>>> if (!_stopped && timeout_ms > 0) {
>>> // Wait
>>> ml.wait(timeout_ms);
>>> + } else if (timeout_ms < -1 * (int64_t)_interval_ms) {
>>> + _nticks += -timeout_ms / _interval_ms;
>>> } else {
>>> // Tick
>>> return !_stopped;
>>> -----------------------------------
>>> For more info, please see the JBS.
>>>
>>> Testing:
>>> - make test TEST="hotspot_gc" CONF=release
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Jie
>>>
>>>
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev
mailing list