RFR: 8223767: Shenandoah fails to build on Solaris x86_64
Aleksey Shipilev
shade at redhat.com
Thu May 16 16:53:34 UTC 2019
On 5/16/19 5:43 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> What is the correct backport procedure?
>
> I think for the Shenandoah parts it's fine to post them here for review,
> and one of us can integrate them to shenandoah/jdk11 and shenandoah/jdk8
> for you. Please prepare the changesets with prefixed [backport] in the
> commit msg, e.g.:
>
> [backport] 8223767: Shenandoah fails to build on Solaris x86_64
I can do this myself while sponsoring fixes for Boris. Thanks for the backport!
> To be honest, I am not sure about the rather trivial change in
> compile.hpp. I guess ideally this would have to go via separate change
> through jdk-updates/jdk11u.
This change is our own code, no need (or use) to go via upstream:
https://builds.shipilev.net/patch-openjdk-shenandoah-jdk11/src/hotspot/share/opto/compile.hpp.sdiff.html
-Aleksey
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20190516/b7076a3c/signature.asc>
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev
mailing list