RFR: 8223961: ZGC: Unexpected behaviour was observed caused by the incorrect update of _nticks in ZMetronome::wait_for_tick()
Jie Fu
fujie at loongson.cn
Fri May 17 08:32:54 UTC 2019
Very nice.
Feel much better when debugging now.
Thank you, Per.
Best regards,
Jie
On 2019/5/17 下午4:03, Per Liden wrote:
> A slight refinement and also removing ZMetronome::nticks() as it's not
> very useful anymore.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pliden/8223961/webrev.0
>
> /Per
>
> On 5/17/19 8:14 AM, Per Liden wrote:
>> Let's wait for a second Reviewer to give thumbs up, then I'll go
>> ahead and sponsor/push this.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Per
>>
>> On 5/16/19 11:21 AM, Jie Fu wrote:
>>> It's much clearer and more reasonable.
>>> I like your patch.
>>> Thanks Per.
>>>
>>> On 2019/5/16 下午4:40, Per Liden wrote:
>>>> On 05/16/2019 08:25 AM, Per Liden wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> There is code in ZStat that assumes ZMetronome::ntick() never
>>>>> skips over ticks. That would need to be addressed if we do
>>>>> something like this. Otherwise we risk not getting statistics
>>>>> print outs just because the metronome overslept. I'll take a look
>>>>> at it.
>>>>
>>>> I was thinking something like this:
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.cpp
>>>> b/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.cpp
>>>> --- a/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.cpp
>>>> +++ b/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.cpp
>>>> @@ -45,7 +45,9 @@
>>>> _start_ms = TimeHelper::counter_to_millis(now.value());
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - for (;;) {
>>>> + MonitorLocker ml(&_monitor, Monitor::_no_safepoint_check_flag);
>>>> +
>>>> + while (!_stopped) {
>>>> // We might wake up spuriously from wait, so always recalculate
>>>> // the timeout after a wakeup to see if we need to wait again.
>>>> const Ticks now = Ticks::now();
>>>> @@ -53,15 +55,24 @@
>>>> const uint64_t next_ms = _start_ms + (_interval_ms * _nticks);
>>>> const int64_t timeout_ms = next_ms - now_ms;
>>>>
>>>> - MonitorLocker ml(&_monitor, Monitor::_no_safepoint_check_flag);
>>>> - if (!_stopped && timeout_ms > 0) {
>>>> + if (timeout_ms > 0) {
>>>> // Wait
>>>> ml.wait(timeout_ms);
>>>> } else {
>>>> // Tick
>>>> - return !_stopped;
>>>> + if (timeout_ms < -_interval_ms) {
>>>> + // Missed one or more ticks. Bump _nticks accordingly to
>>>> + // avoid firing a string of immediate ticks to make up
>>>> + // for the ones we missed.
>>>> + _nticks += -timeout_ms / _interval_ms;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return true;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> + // Stopped
>>>> + return false;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> void ZMetronome::stop() {
>>>> diff --git a/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.hpp
>>>> b/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.hpp
>>>> --- a/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.hpp
>>>> +++ b/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.hpp
>>>> @@ -29,11 +29,11 @@
>>>>
>>>> class ZMetronome : public StackObj {
>>>> private:
>>>> - Monitor _monitor;
>>>> - const uint64_t _interval_ms;
>>>> - uint64_t _start_ms;
>>>> - uint64_t _nticks;
>>>> - bool _stopped;
>>>> + Monitor _monitor;
>>>> + const int64_t _interval_ms;
>>>> + uint64_t _start_ms;
>>>> + uint64_t _nticks;
>>>> + bool _stopped;
>>>>
>>>> public:
>>>> ZMetronome(uint64_t hz);
>>>> diff --git a/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zStat.cpp
>>>> b/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zStat.cpp
>>>> --- a/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zStat.cpp
>>>> +++ b/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zStat.cpp
>>>> @@ -850,7 +850,16 @@
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> bool ZStat::should_print(LogTargetHandle log) const {
>>>> - return log.is_enabled() && (_metronome.nticks() %
>>>> ZStatisticsInterval == 0);
>>>> + static uint64_t print_at_nticks = ZStatisticsInterval;
>>>> + uint64_t nticks = _metronome.nticks();
>>>> +
>>>> + if (nticks < print_at_nticks) {
>>>> + return false;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + print_at_nticks = ((nticks / ZStatisticsInterval) *
>>>> ZStatisticsInterval) + ZStatisticsInterval;
>>>> +
>>>> + return log.is_enabled();
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> void ZStat::print(LogTargetHandle log, const ZStatSamplerHistory*
>>>> history) const {
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> Per
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> Per
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/15/2019 04:33 PM, Jie Fu wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223961
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please review the following patch which fixes the update of
>>>>>> "_nticks" in ZMetronome::wait_for_tick()
>>>>>> -----------------------------------
>>>>>> diff -r b0b20413d853 src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.cpp
>>>>>> --- a/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.cpp Wed May 15
>>>>>> 11:53:47 2019 +0200
>>>>>> +++ b/src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zMetronome.cpp Wed May 15
>>>>>> 20:15:39 2019 +0800
>>>>>> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@
>>>>>> if (!_stopped && timeout_ms > 0) {
>>>>>> // Wait
>>>>>> ml.wait(timeout_ms);
>>>>>> + } else if (timeout_ms < -1 * (int64_t)_interval_ms) {
>>>>>> + _nticks += -timeout_ms / _interval_ms;
>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>> // Tick
>>>>>> return !_stopped;
>>>>>> -----------------------------------
>>>>>> For more info, please see the JBS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Testing:
>>>>>> - make test TEST="hotspot_gc" CONF=release
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Jie
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev
mailing list