RFR(S): 8237776: Shenandoah: Wrong result with Lucene test

[Roman Kennke]

Thinking more about it: we should probably change the synopsis for the bug
and RFR:
- Fix is not in Shenandoah code, but shared. Even though only Shenandoah
currently seems to fall over it. Also, should probably draw attention of
non-Shenandoah reviewers...
- Maybe reflect what the problem is and/or what the fix is?

Thanks,
Roman

Roman Kennke <rkennke at redhat.com> schrieb am Fr., 31. Jan. 2020, 10:58:

>
>
> Roland Westrelin <rwestrel at redhat.com> schrieb am Fr., 31. Jan. 2020,
> 10:55:
>
>>
>> > the patch looks good, but it lacks the x86_32 counterpart. Or would you
>> > rather handle that separately?
>>
>> Actually, AFAIU, the 64 bits fix covers 32 bits too. 32bits needs xmm0
>> and xmm1 saved. So we're saving too many registers on 32 bits but that
>> seems pretty armless.
>>
>> Roland.
>>
>
> Ah OK. Good then!
>
> (armless... nice typo! :-D )
>
> Thanks,
> Roman
>
>
>>