RFR (M): 8210462: Fix remaining mentions of initial mark

[Kim Barrett]

> On Jul 7, 2020, at 4:39 AM, Thomas Schatzl <thomas.schatzl at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Kim,
> 
>  thanks for your review.
> 
> On 03.07.20 22:29, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/gc/g1/g1Policy.cpp
>> [removed]
>>  636   bool this_pause_was_young_only = collector_state()->in_young_only_phase();
>> Why was this variable removed and uses replaced with
>> is_young_only_only(this_pause), rather than keeping the variable but
>> updating the initialization?
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> The reason is that this_pause_was_young_only is a local defined waaay up at the top of that method and I thought instead of referencing that one it is better to do the (very simple) function call.
> I can change that again if you want.

OK.  The “far away” rationale makes sense.

> Webrevs:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8210462/webrev.1_to_2/ (diff)
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8210462/webrev.2/ (full)
> Testing:
> tier1, local gc/g1 jtreg run

Looks good.