[15] RFR 8245823: Shenandoah: inline/optimize ShenandoahEvacOOMScope
Zhengyu Gu
zgu at redhat.com
Tue May 26 19:28:28 UTC 2020
On 5/26/20 2:00 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 5/26/20 7:57 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>> Hm! I actually thought we optimized ShenandoahHeap::heap() enough not to matter [1]. Reverting
>>> heap() cache would seem to ditch some of these overloads:
>>>
>>> 131 inline ShenandoahEvacOOMScope();
>>> 132 inline ShenandoahEvacOOMScope(Thread* t);
>>> 133 inline ShenandoahEvacOOMScope(ShenandoahHeap* heap);
>>> 134 inline ShenandoahEvacOOMScope(ShenandoahHeap* heap, Thread* t);
>>> 135 inline ~ShenandoahEvacOOMScope();
>>>
>>> Thread:current() seems fine to pass, where available, and store locally.
>>
>> Okay, updated:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8245823/webrev.01/index.html
>
> Looks fine to me. Roman might want to take a look.
Sure.
>
> Nit: Excess spacing at L126 here:
>
> 124 class ShenandoahEvacOOMScope : public StackObj {
> 125 private:
> 126 Thread* const _thread;
>
Will fix before push.
Thanks,
-Zhengyu
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev
mailing list