RFR: 8057586: Explicit GC ignored if GCLocker is active [v10]
Ivan Walulya
iwalulya at openjdk.org
Thu Apr 20 15:46:49 UTC 2023
> Hi All,
>
> Please review this change to guarantee that at least a Full GC is executed between the invocation and return of an explicit Full GC call, even if the call is concurrent with an active `GCLocker`. We specify explicit GCs as GCs triggered by the end user in some form (jcmd, System.GC, or WhiteBox testing).
>
> The change should also handle the issues reported in JDK-8299276.
>
> Split into 3 commits, one commit for changes to each GC in [G1, Parallel, Serial].
>
> Testing: Tier 1-5.
Ivan Walulya has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
Albert Review
-------------
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13191/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13191/files/bd418d01..bb88da8f
Webrevs:
- full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=13191&range=09
- incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=13191&range=08-09
Stats: 9 lines in 6 files changed: 0 ins; 4 del; 5 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13191.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13191/head:pull/13191
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13191
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev
mailing list