RFR: 8309622: Re-examine the cache mechanism in BaseLocale
Daniel Fuchs
dfuchs at openjdk.org
Mon Jun 12 14:37:41 UTC 2023
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 22:17:39 GMT, Naoto Sato <naoto at openjdk.org> wrote:
> This is stemming from the PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14211 where aggressive GC can cause NPE in `BaseLocale$Key` class. I refactored the in-house cache with WeakHashMap, and removed the Key class as it is no longer needed (thus the original NPE will no longer be possible). Also with the new JMH test case, it gains some performance improvement:
>
> (w/o fix)
>
> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
> LocaleCache.testForLanguageTag avgt 20 5781.275 ± 569.580 ns/op
> LocaleCache.testLocaleOf avgt 20 62564.079 ± 406.697 ns/op
>
> (w/ fix)
> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
> LocaleCache.testForLanguageTag avgt 20 4801.175 ± 371.830 ns/op
> LocaleCache.testLocaleOf avgt 20 60394.652 ± 352.471 ns/op
One thing though - WeakHashMap is not thread safe - and I don't see any locks or synchronized to protect access to CACHE. Is that going to cause trouble if two threads compete to add a locale to the map? In other words - how confident are we that the race would be benign?
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14404#pullrequestreview-1475096535
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev
mailing list