RFR: 8310031: Parallel: Implement better work distribution for large object arrays in old gen [v17]

Wed Oct 11 17:04:09 UTC 2023

On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:53:13 GMT, Richard Reingruber <rrich at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> No, I mean L212 to L228.  "Comment on lines +212 to +228"
>
> Yes indeed. Looks correct to me. Nice simplification!

> No, I mean L212 to L228. "Comment on lines +212 to +228"

I looked at this at first but thought it is obviously wrong if `obj` is precisely marked after a previous young collection. But if it is precisely marked it is of course correct scan from the beginning of the dirty chunk (addr_l) to the obj/stripe end.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14846#discussion_r1355385596