RFR: 8336640: Shenandoah: Parallel worker use in parallel_heap_region_iterate [v2]
Aleksey Shipilev
shade at openjdk.org
Wed Jul 24 20:05:32 UTC 2024
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:50:44 GMT, Xiaolong Peng <xpeng at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> [parallel_heap_region_iterate](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahHeap.cpp#L1726-L1734) is used to execute lightweight operations on heap regions, including ShenandoahPrepareForMarkClosure, ShenandoahInitMarkUpdateRegionStateClosure, ShenandoahFinalUpdateRefsUpdateRegionStateClosure, ShenandoahResetUpdateRegionStateClosure and ShenandoahFinalMarkUpdateRegionStateClosure. Since all the operations are very lightweight, in regular cases w/o large number of heap regions, the parallelism seems to be an overkill because the cost of multi-thread orchestrating could be more expensive; In most cases, single thread should be more efficient. Also, if multiple threading is needed, we should maximize the utilization of all active workers for best performance.
>>
>> This PR includes proposed improvments addressing the known issues:
>> 1. Change the default value of ShenandoahParallelRegionStride to 0, when it is 0, Shenandoah will auto derive the value of stride for best performance;
>> 2. if num_regions is <= 4096, not use worker threads at all to avoid the overhead of multi-threading;
>> 3. When num_regions is more than 4096, use worker threads to parallelize the workload, derive the value of stride to evenly distribute the workload to all active workers.
>> 4. When number of active workers is 1, don't bother the workers, it is faster to finish the workload in current thread(avoid overhead of multi-threads orchestration)
>>
>> There are some time metrics I collected from test with TIP version(I added time metrics for parallel_heap_region_iterate):
>>
>> JVM args: export JAVA_OPTS="-Xms8G -Xmx8G -XX:+AlwaysPreTouch -XX:+UseShenandoahGC -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:ShenandoahParallelRegionStride=<stride> -XX:ShenandoahTargetNumRegions=<num_regions> -Xlog:gc*"
>>
>> | | 1024 regions | 2048 regions | 4096 regions | 8192 regions |16384 regions |
>> | ----------- | ------------ | ------------ | ------------ | ------------ |------------ |
>> | 1024 stride | 5785 ns | 22194 ns | 20953 ns | 23008 ns |33013 ns |
>> | 2048 stride | N/A | 6491 ns | 22476 ns | 25842 ns |34378 ns |
>> | 4096 stride | N/A | N/A | 14034 ns | 28425 ns |36324 ns |
>> | 8192 stride | N/A | N/A | N/A | 24359 ns |45231 ns |
>> | 16384 stride | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A ...
>
> Xiaolong Peng has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Add trailing space
Marked as reviewed by shade (Reviewer).
I see double-digit-us improvements on my Mac, nice.
# Before
[30.851s][info][gc,stats] Pause Init Mark (G) = 0.076 s (a = 272 us) (n = 281) (lvls, us = 47, 137, 199, 246, 5296)
[30.851s][info][gc,stats] Pause Init Mark (N) = 0.019 s (a = 68 us) (n = 281) (lvls, us = 20, 49, 57, 71, 617)
[30.851s][info][gc,stats] Update Region States = 0.014 s (a = 49 us) (n = 281) (lvls, us = 13, 34, 41, 51, 368)
# After
[30.301s][info][gc,stats] Pause Init Mark (G) = 0.073 s (a = 239 us) (n = 307) (lvls, us = 31, 90, 162, 217, 3586)
[30.301s][info][gc,stats] Pause Init Mark (N) = 0.009 s (a = 28 us) (n = 307) (lvls, us = 10, 21, 26, 33, 188)
[30.301s][info][gc,stats] Update Region States = 0.004 s (a = 14 us) (n = 307) (lvls, us = 4, 11, 13, 15, 176)
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20305#pullrequestreview-2197663679
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20305#issuecomment-2248800641
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev
mailing list