RFR: 8328278: Serial: Compute tenuring threshold before GC

Wed Mar 20 17:04:41 UTC 2024

On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:44:49 GMT, Y. Srinivas Ramakrishna <ysr at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I agree that it would seem useful to fix the inconsistency.

Terrific.

Regarding how to address the issue, after considering it further, I believe the threshold is not intrinsically linked to the age table. Therefore, it likely makes sense to exclude it from the age-table `print_age_table`. Specific collectors could choose to include the threshold in the log if they find it valuable. Then, this removes the ambiguity in the `print_age_table` output. What do others think?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18329#issuecomment-2010072160