RFR: 8339648: ZGC: Division by zero in rule_major_allocation_rate [v3]

[Axel Boldt-Christmas]

On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:07:42 GMT, Matthias Baesken <mbaesken at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The HS jtreg test gc/stringdedup/TestStringDeduplicationAgeThreshold_ZGenerational
>> shows this error when running with ubsan enabled 
>> 
>> src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zDirector.cpp:491:74: runtime error: division by zero
>>     #0 0x7f09886401d4 in rule_major_allocation_rate src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zDirector.cpp:491
>>     #1 0x7f09886401d4 in start_gc src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zDirector.cpp:822
>>     #2 0x7f09886401d4 in ZDirector::run_thread() src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zDirector.cpp:912
>>     #3 0x7f098c1404e8 in ZThread::run_service() src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zThread.cpp:29
>>     #4 0x7f09897cac19 in ConcurrentGCThread::run() src/hotspot/share/gc/shared/concurrentGCThread.cpp:48
>>     #5 0x7f098bb46b0a in Thread::call_run() src/hotspot/share/runtime/thread.cpp:225
>>     #6 0x7f098b1a9881 in thread_native_entry src/hotspot/os/linux/os_linux.cpp:858
>
> Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   add parentheses

Changes requested by aboldtch (Reviewer).

src/hotspot/share/gc/z/zDirector.cpp line 492:

> 490:   const double current_young_gc_time_per_bytes_freed = double(young_gc_time) / double(reclaimed_per_young_gc);
> 491:   const double current_old_gc_time_per_bytes_freed = ((reclaimed_per_old_gc == 0) ? (std::numeric_limits<double>::infinity())
> 492:                                                                                   : (double(old_gc_time) / double(reclaimed_per_old_gc)));

Suggestion:

  const double current_old_gc_time_per_bytes_freed = reclaimed_per_old_gc == 0 ? std::numeric_limits<double>::infinity() : (double(old_gc_time) / double(reclaimed_per_old_gc));


Sorry I probably confused things here. I think this is what was wanted. I just added all the parentheses as a clarification of how this was meant to be parsed by the compiler.

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20888#pullrequestreview-2307097576
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20888#discussion_r1761435309