RFR: 8366145: Help diagnose ubsan division by zero in computing pause time ratios

[Thomas Schatzl]

On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:18:03 GMT, Kim Barrett <kbarrett at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I think `fabs` is just clutter, and doesn't add anything.
>
> I think checking for zero is fine, rather than some small interval. We're
> trying to figure out how someone got a ubsan divide-by-zero complaint in the
> next statement. It's a supposition that a broken (insufficiently granular)
> clock was involved. If that's the case, checking for a small interval won't
> change anything, as the coarse clock will either not tick, or tick by some
> largish amount.

also good with me.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26939#discussion_r2304124306