RFR: 8370568: Refer to Thread.interrupted as "interrupted status" consistently [v3]

[Pavel Rappo]

On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 09:39:55 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <jpai at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hello Pavel, these changes look OK to me.
> 
> Over time I think it will be harder to keep track or enforce this in code comments but I think it is easier to enforce for API specification text.

Moving from "interrupted" to "interrupt" was a slow drift rather than a landslide. I think it's okay to repair it once. _Loom_ is already in and once _structured concurrency_ is in, I don't expect many new occurrences of "interrupt" in the foreseeable future. But you are right, the important bit is the specification, not the code comments.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27972#issuecomment-3460767516