RFR: 8351334: [ubsan] memoryReserver.cpp:552:60: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 1073741824 to null pointer [v5]

[Afshin Zafari]

On Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:01:36 GMT, Axel Boldt-Christmas <aboldtch at openjdk.org> wrote:

> What is the reasoning behind using `uint64_t` rather than `uintptr_t`?

I follow (IIUC) your comments on replacing uintptr_t and uint64_t because of differences in platforms.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26955#issuecomment-3305900059