Do you know how long this bug goes back? Should the fix be back-ported to earlier releases (i.e. 6uXX and 7uXX) ?<br><br>thanks for fixing; i'll review the fix later this afternoon.<br>-- ramki<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Jon Masamitsu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jon.masamitsu@oracle.com">jon.masamitsu@oracle.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Looks good.<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 11/29/2011 3:36 AM, Stefan Karlsson wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<a href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Estefank/7112034/webrev/" target="_blank">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~<u></u>stefank/7112034/webrev/</a><br>
<br>
7112034: Parallel CMS fails to properly mark reference objects<br>
Summary: Enabled reference processing when work stealing during concurrent marking<br>
<br>
The cause of this bug is that no reference processor is registered with the marking closure that is used during work stealing in the concurrent mark phase. If we add the reference processor we find the expected number of Finalizer objects during concurrent marking.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>