<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font size="-1"><font face="Verdana">Yeah SPECjEnterprise2010 is
good for GC testing, but as you've found out setup is more
complicated than other SPEC benchmarks. I would recommend using
SPECjbb2005 for now.</font></font><br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Azeem Jiva
@javawithjiva</pre>
<br>
On 06/12/2012 02:12 AM, Lokesh Gidra wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:aisisjfud330k00sv2v9rw8r.1339485133709@email.android.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div>Thanks for the info. BTW, is SPECjEnterprise any good for
this purpose? What i could understand is that it needs multiple
hosts for testing. I want to GC performance on a single instance
of jvm.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks</div>
<div>Lokesh</div>
<br>
Azeem Jiva <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:azeem.jiva@oracle.com"><azeem.jiva@oracle.com></a> wrote:<br>
<font size="-1"><font face="Verdana">Sorry, I wrote "slightly
different ways", I meant to just say "different"<br>
<br>
</font></font>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Azeem Jiva
@javawithjiva</pre>
<br>
On 06/12/2012 01:47 AM, Azeem Jiva wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4FD6E5E8.7080700@oracle.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<font size="-1"><font face="Verdana">Just an FYI, SPECjbb2012 is
still under development. Release date is later this year.
Even though both benchmarks are named "JBB" they are vastly
different and are not comparable. They both test business
logic, albeit in slightly different ways. SPECjbb2012 has
an SLA requirement that SPECjbb2005 doesn't and the code for
SPECjbb2012 is written from the ground up and shares nothing
with SPECjbb2005. <br>
</font></font>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Azeem Jiva
@javawithjiva</pre>
<br>
On 06/12/2012 01:01 AM, Lokesh Gidra wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:llwenbuv00ndiha5x1p0xnj6.1339480903763@email.android.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
Actually i have tried SPECjvm2008 but even there benchmarks do
not have large heap requirements.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Is it worth to make both SPECjbb2012 and SPECjbb2005
tests or the former one covers the later?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks</div>
<div>Lokesh</div>
<br>
Igor Veresov <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:iggy.veresov@gmail.com"><iggy.veresov@gmail.com></a>
wrote:<br>
If you have access to SPEC benchmarks, SPECjbb2012 and
SPECjvm2008 are worth trying too. They're all multithreaded
and in many instances would benefit from memory placement
opts.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>igor</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>On Jun 11, 2012, at 7:39 PM, Lokesh Gidra wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff;
font-family:times new roman, new york, times,
serif;font-size:12pt">
<div>Hello,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I am making some NUMA related optimizations to
the parallelScavenge GC. And I want to test the
performance on NUMA multo-core server with some
multi-threaded benchmarks with multi-GB heap
requirements. I have tried DaCapo but its heap
requirements are pretty small. I know of
SPECjbb2055, but nothing other than that. Can
someone please suggest me some benchmarks for this
purpose.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks in advance.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Lokesh<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>