<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/28/13 6:50 PM, Tao Mao wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:515482F1.5070002@oracle.com" type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
      Hi Bengt,<br>
      <br>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/27/2013 11:31 PM, Bengt Rutisson
        wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote cite="mid:5153E3D1.2040002@oracle.com" type="cite">
        <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
          http-equiv="Content-Type">
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
          Hi Tao,<br>
          <br>
          On 3/27/13 11:45 PM, Tao Mao wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote cite="mid:51537686.1030601@oracle.com" type="cite">
          <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
            http-equiv="Content-Type">
          Please see inline.<br>
          Tao<br>
          <br>
          On 3/25/13 9:56 PM, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
          <blockquote cite="mid:51512A97.2030600@oracle.com" type="cite">
            <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
              http-equiv="Content-Type">
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
              Hi Tao,<br>
              <br>
              Thanks for updating the tests. Looks good to me.<br>
              <br>
              Have you tried running the tests? It is a very small
              change so it should be ok. But our testing process is very
              strange and it may be that these tests are not run until
              PIT testing, so running them once before pushing is a good
              idea to avoid unnecessary issues later on.<br>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          They have passed the jtreg tests. I'm going to push it.<br>
          <br>
          script:<br>
          jtreg -jdk:/Users/tamao/home/jdk1.8.0_b74_macosx/ \<br>
          -vmoption:-tamao \<br>
          ./src/8010518MoveDeprecatingCMSIncrementalMode/test/gc/startup_warnings/TestCMSIncrementalMode.java



          \<br>
./src/8010518MoveDeprecatingCMSIncrementalMode/test/gc/startup_warnings/TestIncGC.java<br>
          <br>
          results:<br>
          Test results: passed: 2<br>
          Report written to
          /Users/tamao/Dropbox/Oracle/JTreport/html/report.html<br>
          Results written to /Users/tamao/Dropbox/Oracle/JTwork<br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        Great! Thanks!<br>
        <br>
        <blockquote cite="mid:51537686.1030601@oracle.com" type="cite">
          <blockquote cite="mid:51512A97.2030600@oracle.com" type="cite">
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> <br>
              Also, I see that you decided not to remove "likely" from
              the other messages in Arguments::check_deprecated_gcs().
              Would you like to do that as a separate change or do you
              think we should leave those messages unchanged?<br>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          So what was the decision for deprecating these gc's? To me,
          there hasn't seemed to be any definitive decision, yet.<br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        It is the same decision as for CMSIncrementalMode, where you
        removed the "likely".<br>
        <br>
        Bengt<br>
      </blockquote>
      Where is the latest update regarding this issue? Any mail thread,
      or web?<br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    I think the JEP is pretty clear about it:<br>
    <br>
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/173">http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/173</a><br>
    <br>
    "
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
    The DefNew + CMS and ParNew + SerialOld combinations and the
    Incremental
    Mode of CMS will be deprecated (logging a warning message). This is
    to
    be interpreted as that these GC combinations will be removed in some
    upcoming major release."<br>
    <br>
    Bengt<br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:515482F1.5070002@oracle.com" type="cite"> <br>
      Thank you.<br>
      Tao<br>
      <br>
      <blockquote cite="mid:5153E3D1.2040002@oracle.com" type="cite"> <br>
        <blockquote cite="mid:51537686.1030601@oracle.com" type="cite">
          <blockquote cite="mid:51512A97.2030600@oracle.com" type="cite">
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> <br>
              Thanks,<br>
              Bengt<br>
              <br>
              On 3/25/13 7:48 PM, Tao Mao wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote cite="mid:51509C17.6080808@oracle.com"
              type="cite">
              <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
                http-equiv="Content-Type">
              Thank you for pointing it out, Bengt. A new webrev is
              updated.<br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Etamao/8010518/webrev.02/">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tamao/8010518/webrev.02/</a><br>
              <br>
              Please see inline.<br>
              Tao<br>
              <br>
              On 3/24/13 1:16 PM, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
              <blockquote cite="mid:514F5F16.9080909@oracle.com"
                type="cite">
                <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
                  http-equiv="Content-Type">
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
                  Hi Tao,<br>
                  <br>
                  On 3/23/13 4:51 AM, Tao Mao wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote cite="mid:514D26D2.1030705@oracle.com"
                  type="cite">Thank you for review and suggestion. A new
                  webrev is updated. <br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                    href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Etamao/8010518/webrev.01/">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tamao/8010518/webrev.01/</a>
                  <br>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
                I like Jon's suggestion about removing the word "likely"
                but that means that you need to update these tests:<br>
                <br>
                test/gc/startup_warnings/TestCMSIncrementalMode.java<br>
                test/gc/startup_warnings/TestIncGC.java<br>
              </blockquote>
              Test files modified.<br>
              <blockquote cite="mid:514F5F16.9080909@oracle.com"
                type="cite"> <br>
                Also, would it make sense to remove the word "likely"
                from the warning messages in
                <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
                  charset=UTF-8">
                Arguments::check_deprecated_gcs() too? In that case you
                need to update these tests as well:<br>
                <br>
                test/gc/startup_warnings/TestDefNewCMS.java<br>
                test/gc/startup_warnings/TestParNewSerialOld.java<br>
              </blockquote>
              Have we made a decision to certainly remove these gc
              comb's in future? If so, it's OK to state so. Anyway, it
              would be better to resolve it with a separate CR. <br>
              <blockquote cite="mid:514F5F16.9080909@oracle.com"
                type="cite"> <br>
                Bengt<br>
                <br>
                <blockquote cite="mid:514D26D2.1030705@oracle.com"
                  type="cite"> <br>
                  Tao <br>
                  <br>
                  On 3/22/13 1:56 PM, Jon Masamitsu wrote: <br>
                  <blockquote type="cite">Tao, <br>
                    <br>
                    Changes look fine.  I would remove the "likely" so
                    that messages read like <br>
                    <br>
                    "and will be removed in a future release" <br>
                    <br>
                    Fewer words are better and the intent is still
                    clear. <br>
                    <br>
                    Jon <br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    On 3/21/2013 4:23 PM, Tao Mao wrote: <br>
                    <blockquote type="cite">A simple changeset. Need a
                      reviewer! <br>
                      <br>
                      8010518 Move deprecating CMSIncrementalMode from
                      Arguments::check_deprecated_gcs() to
                      Arguments::check_deprecated_gc_flags() <br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                        href="https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8010518">https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8010518</a>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      webrev: <br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                        href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Etamao/8010518/webrev.00/">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tamao/8010518/webrev.00/</a>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      changeset: <br>
                      Cleanup suggested by Bengt. <br>
                    </blockquote>
                    <br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
              </blockquote>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>