<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Hi all,<br>
    <br>
    After reading JEP documentation, I don't feel like moving
    CMSIncrementalMode to check_deprecated_gc_flags()
    <meta charset="utf-8">
    because it's essentially Incremental CMS collector. It's more
    expected to live in check_deprecated_gcs() (at least to me). What
    are your opinions? If no one opposes, I will close this CR.<br>
    <br>
    Thanks.<br>
    Tao<br>
    <br>
    On 3/28/13 11:09 AM, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
    <blockquote cite="mid:5154873F.60002@oracle.com" type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/28/13 6:50 PM, Tao Mao wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote cite="mid:515482F1.5070002@oracle.com" type="cite">
        <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
          http-equiv="Content-Type">
        Hi Bengt,<br>
        <br>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/27/2013 11:31 PM, Bengt
          Rutisson wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote cite="mid:5153E3D1.2040002@oracle.com" type="cite">
          <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
            http-equiv="Content-Type">
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
            Hi Tao,<br>
            <br>
            On 3/27/13 11:45 PM, Tao Mao wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote cite="mid:51537686.1030601@oracle.com" type="cite">
            <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
              http-equiv="Content-Type">
            Please see inline.<br>
            Tao<br>
            <br>
            On 3/25/13 9:56 PM, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
            <blockquote cite="mid:51512A97.2030600@oracle.com"
              type="cite">
              <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
                http-equiv="Content-Type">
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
                Hi Tao,<br>
                <br>
                Thanks for updating the tests. Looks good to me.<br>
                <br>
                Have you tried running the tests? It is a very small
                change so it should be ok. But our testing process is
                very strange and it may be that these tests are not run
                until PIT testing, so running them once before pushing
                is a good idea to avoid unnecessary issues later on.<br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            They have passed the jtreg tests. I'm going to push it.<br>
            <br>
            script:<br>
            jtreg -jdk:/Users/tamao/home/jdk1.8.0_b74_macosx/ \<br>
            -vmoption:-tamao \<br>
            ./src/8010518MoveDeprecatingCMSIncrementalMode/test/gc/startup_warnings/TestCMSIncrementalMode.java




            \<br>
./src/8010518MoveDeprecatingCMSIncrementalMode/test/gc/startup_warnings/TestIncGC.java<br>
            <br>
            results:<br>
            Test results: passed: 2<br>
            Report written to
            /Users/tamao/Dropbox/Oracle/JTreport/html/report.html<br>
            Results written to /Users/tamao/Dropbox/Oracle/JTwork<br>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
          Great! Thanks!<br>
          <br>
          <blockquote cite="mid:51537686.1030601@oracle.com" type="cite">
            <blockquote cite="mid:51512A97.2030600@oracle.com"
              type="cite">
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> <br>
                Also, I see that you decided not to remove "likely" from
                the other messages in Arguments::check_deprecated_gcs().
                Would you like to do that as a separate change or do you
                think we should leave those messages unchanged?<br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            So what was the decision for deprecating these gc's? To me,
            there hasn't seemed to be any definitive decision, yet.<br>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
          It is the same decision as for CMSIncrementalMode, where you
          removed the "likely".<br>
          <br>
          Bengt<br>
        </blockquote>
        Where is the latest update regarding this issue? Any mail
        thread, or web?<br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      I think the JEP is pretty clear about it:<br>
      <br>
      <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
        href="http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/173">http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/173</a><br>
      <br>
      "
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      The DefNew + CMS and ParNew + SerialOld combinations and the
      Incremental Mode of CMS will be deprecated (logging a warning
      message). This is to be interpreted as that these GC combinations
      will be removed in some upcoming major release."<br>
      <br>
      Bengt<br>
      <blockquote cite="mid:515482F1.5070002@oracle.com" type="cite"> <br>
        Thank you.<br>
        Tao<br>
        <br>
        <blockquote cite="mid:5153E3D1.2040002@oracle.com" type="cite">
          <br>
          <blockquote cite="mid:51537686.1030601@oracle.com" type="cite">
            <blockquote cite="mid:51512A97.2030600@oracle.com"
              type="cite">
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> <br>
                Thanks,<br>
                Bengt<br>
                <br>
                On 3/25/13 7:48 PM, Tao Mao wrote:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote cite="mid:51509C17.6080808@oracle.com"
                type="cite">
                <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
                  http-equiv="Content-Type">
                Thank you for pointing it out, Bengt. A new webrev is
                updated.<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Etamao/8010518/webrev.02/">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tamao/8010518/webrev.02/</a><br>
                <br>
                Please see inline.<br>
                Tao<br>
                <br>
                On 3/24/13 1:16 PM, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
                <blockquote cite="mid:514F5F16.9080909@oracle.com"
                  type="cite">
                  <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
                    http-equiv="Content-Type">
                  <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
                    Hi Tao,<br>
                    <br>
                    On 3/23/13 4:51 AM, Tao Mao wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                  <blockquote cite="mid:514D26D2.1030705@oracle.com"
                    type="cite">Thank you for review and suggestion. A
                    new webrev is updated. <br>
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                      href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Etamao/8010518/webrev.01/">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tamao/8010518/webrev.01/</a>
                    <br>
                  </blockquote>
                  <br>
                  I like Jon's suggestion about removing the word
                  "likely" but that means that you need to update these
                  tests:<br>
                  <br>
                  test/gc/startup_warnings/TestCMSIncrementalMode.java<br>
                  test/gc/startup_warnings/TestIncGC.java<br>
                </blockquote>
                Test files modified.<br>
                <blockquote cite="mid:514F5F16.9080909@oracle.com"
                  type="cite"> <br>
                  Also, would it make sense to remove the word "likely"
                  from the warning messages in
                  <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
                    charset=UTF-8">
                  Arguments::check_deprecated_gcs() too? In that case
                  you need to update these tests as well:<br>
                  <br>
                  test/gc/startup_warnings/TestDefNewCMS.java<br>
                  test/gc/startup_warnings/TestParNewSerialOld.java<br>
                </blockquote>
                Have we made a decision to certainly remove these gc
                comb's in future? If so, it's OK to state so. Anyway, it
                would be better to resolve it with a separate CR. <br>
                <blockquote cite="mid:514F5F16.9080909@oracle.com"
                  type="cite"> <br>
                  Bengt<br>
                  <br>
                  <blockquote cite="mid:514D26D2.1030705@oracle.com"
                    type="cite"> <br>
                    Tao <br>
                    <br>
                    On 3/22/13 1:56 PM, Jon Masamitsu wrote: <br>
                    <blockquote type="cite">Tao, <br>
                      <br>
                      Changes look fine.  I would remove the "likely" so
                      that messages read like <br>
                      <br>
                      "and will be removed in a future release" <br>
                      <br>
                      Fewer words are better and the intent is still
                      clear. <br>
                      <br>
                      Jon <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      On 3/21/2013 4:23 PM, Tao Mao wrote: <br>
                      <blockquote type="cite">A simple changeset. Need a
                        reviewer! <br>
                        <br>
                        8010518 Move deprecating CMSIncrementalMode from
                        Arguments::check_deprecated_gcs() to
                        Arguments::check_deprecated_gc_flags() <br>
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                          href="https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8010518">https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8010518</a>
                        <br>
                        <br>
                        webrev: <br>
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                          href="http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Etamao/8010518/webrev.00/">http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tamao/8010518/webrev.00/</a>
                        <br>
                        <br>
                        changeset: <br>
                        Cleanup suggested by Bengt. <br>
                      </blockquote>
                      <br>
                    </blockquote>
                  </blockquote>
                  <br>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>