<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Thanks Martijin and Kirk!<br>
<br>
Also a great idea from Kirk to reconfigure the apps he uses to use
G1.<br>
<br>
charlie<br>
<br>
On 06/05/2015 03:54 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7YuATvdMpboiqrRxsAkNNsUzCO7=YOunU=vPuHrRg_0gwiTw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">+1 from me - when the proposed change lands we'll
reach out to our customers and get them to try it.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div class="gmail_signature">Cheers,<br>
Martijn</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 5 June 2015 at 09:39, Kirk
Pepperdine <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:kirk@kodewerk.com" target="_blank">kirk@kodewerk.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi
Charlie,<br>
<br>
An excellent summary. I like Mark’s suggestion that there be
a path to roll back should we discover something before GA.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Kirk<br>
<br>
BTW, I’ve reconfigured everything I use to use G1<br>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On Jun 5, 2015, at 12:08 AM, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mark.reinhold@oracle.com">mark.reinhold@oracle.com</a>
wrote:<br>
<br>
> 2015/6/4 6:44 -0700, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:charlie.hunt@oracle.com">charlie.hunt@oracle.com</a>:<br>
>> Wanted to come back to this thread, continue
the dialog, reiterate the<br>
>> objective, (try to) summarize the concerns and
put forth a potential<br>
>> plan for this JEP going forward.<br>
>><br>
>> Intent: Use G1 GC as the default collector
chosen by the JVM when no<br>
>> GC is explicitly set at the JVM command line.<br>
>><br>
>> ...<br>
><br>
> Charlie -- thanks for the excellent summary of this
wide-ranging<br>
> discussion!<br>
><br>
>> ...<br>
>><br>
>> Suggested plan for moving forward:<br>
>> - Make G1 the default collector in JDK 9,
continue to evaluate G1 and<br>
>> enhance G1 in JDK 9<br>
>> - Mitigate risk by reverting back to Parallel
GC before JDK 9 goes<br>
>> “Generally Available” (Sept 22, 2016 [1]) if
warranted by continuing<br>
>> to monitor observations and experiences with
G1 in both JDK 9<br>
>> pre-releases and latest JDK 8 update releases<br>
>> - Address enhancing ergonomics for selecting a
default GC as a<br>
>> separate JEP if future observations suggests
its needed<br>
><br>
> I think this is a fine plan.<br>
><br>
> Stefan -- To move forward with JEP 248, could you
please revise the<br>
> second item in the "Risks and Assumptions" section
to note that there<br>
> is some concern that G1 might not be ready to
become the default, that<br>
> making it the default now will allow us to get more
feedback on it, and<br>
> that if it proves to be not ready then we'll revert
the default to the<br>
> Parallel GC in time for JDK 9 GA?<br>
><br>
> Ben -- Can you live with this plan?<br>
><br>
> - Mark<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>