does UseParallelOldGC guarantee a better full gc performance

[the.6th.month at gmail.com]

Hi, Jon,
yup,,,I know, but what is weird is the paroldgen doesn't bring about better
full gc performance as seen from JMX metrics but bring unexpected swap
consumption.
I am gonna look into my application instead for some inspiration.

Leon

On 19 April 2012 00:19, Jon Masamitsu <jon.masamitsu at oracle.com> wrote:

> **
> Leon,
>
> In this log you see as part of an entry "PSOldGen:" which says you're
> using the serial mark sweep.  I see in your later posts that "ParOldGen:"
> appears in your log and that is the parallel mark sweep collector.
>
> Jon
>
>
> On 4/18/2012 1:58 AM, the.6th.month at gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi, Simon:
>
> this is the full gc log for your concern.
> 2012-04-18T16:47:24.824+0800: 988.392: [GC
> Desired survivor size 14876672 bytes, new threshold 1 (max 15)
>  [PSYoungGen: 236288K->8126K(247616K)] 4054802K->3830711K(4081472K),
> 0.0512250 secs] [Times: user=0.15 sys=0.00, real=0.05 secs]
>
> 2012-04-18T16:47:24.875+0800: 988.443: [Full GC [PSYoungGen:
> 8126K->0K(247616K)] [PSOldGen: 3822585K->1751429K(3833856K)]
> 3830711K->1751429K(4081472K) [PSPermGen: 81721K->81721K(262144K)],
> 6.6108630 secs] [Times: user=6.62 sys=0.00, real=6.61 secs]
>
> the full gc time is almost unchanged since I enabled paralleloldgc.
>
> Do you have any recommendation for an appropriate young gen size?
>
> Thanks
>
> All the best,
> Leon
>
>
> On 18 April 2012 16:24, Simone Bordet <sbordet at intalio.com> <sbordet at intalio.com> wrote:
>
>
>  Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:16, the.6th.month at gmail.com<the.6th.month at gmail.com> <the.6th.month at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  hi all:
> I'm currently using jdk 6u26. I just enabled UseParallelOldGC, expecting
> that would enhance the full gc efficiency and decrease the mark-sweep
>
>  time
>
>  by using multiple-core. The JAVA_OPTS is as below:
> -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintGCDateStamps -XX:+PrintTenuringDistribution
> -Xloggc:gc.log-server -Xms4000m -Xmx4000m -Xss256k -Xmn256m
> -XX:PermSize=256m -XX:+UseParallelOldGC  -server
> -Dorg.apache.jasper.compiler.Parser.STRICT_QUOTE_ESCAPING=false
> as shown in jinfo output, the settings have taken effect, and the
> ParallelGCThreads is 4 since the jvm is running on a four-core server.
> But what's strange is that the mark-sweep time remains almost unchanged
>
>  (at
>
>  around 6-8 seconds), do I miss something here? Does anyone have the same
> experience or any idea about the reason behind?
> Thanks very much for help
>
>  The young generation is fairly small for a 4GiB heap.
>
> Can we see the lines you mention from the logs ?
>
> Simon
> --http://cometd.orghttp://intalio.comhttp://bordet.blogspot.com
> ----
> Finally, no matter how good the architecture and design are,
> to deliver bug-free software with optimal performance and reliability,
> the implementation technique must be flawless.   Victoria Livschitz
> _______________________________________________
> hotspot-gc-use mailing listhotspot-gc-use at openjdk.java.nethttp://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/hotspot-gc-use
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hotspot-gc-use mailing listhotspot-gc-use at openjdk.java.nethttp://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/hotspot-gc-use
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hotspot-gc-use mailing list
> hotspot-gc-use at openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/hotspot-gc-use
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-gc-use/attachments/20120419/ecb9a050/attachment.html