Seeking help regarding Full GCs with G1

Wolfgang Pedot wolfgang.pedot at finkzeit.at
Thu Aug 7 11:46:30 UTC 2014


Hi,

I think you should also increase InitiatingHeapOccupancyPercent, this 
marks the level of total heap occupation where G1 starts the concurrent 
marking phase leading to mixed collects. The default is 45% and since 
your footprint seems to be above that G1 will probably do lots of 
"useless" mixed collects all the time.

regards
Wolfgang

Am 07.08.2014 04:17, schrieb Srini Padman:
> Ah, I see. I think that does explain the mystery.
>
> The Oracle documentation only says this parameter "sets the occupancy 
> threshold for an old region to be included in a mixed garbage 
> collection cycle. The default occupancy is 65 percent." and I 
> interpreted that as meaning a lower threshold rather than an upper 
> threshold. It should have been obvious to me that the "Garbage First' 
> collector, which aims to collect the "least live data first", will aim 
> for an upper threshold, but yet I settled on exactly the wrong 
> interpretation. Thanks for setting me right!
>
> Knowing this, I now think that the default 10% G1HeapWastePercent  
> value (which computes to 400 MB for us) and the application's 
> footprint (~ 2.2 GB) *together* put our application at exactly the 
> default occupancy threshold of 65% (2.6 GB). So we would have been 
> operating in a configuration where no mixed GCs would ever be seen to 
> be required. (Please correct me if that calculation is wrong.)
>
> If we decrease G1HeapWastePercent to 5% and increase 
> G1MixedGCLiveThresholdPercent to 75%, then the corresponding numbers 
> would be (2.2 GB footprint + 200 MB waste < 3 GB) so we will be doing 
> mixed GCs from 2.4 GB until we (roughly) hit 3 GB after which the 
> chances of a Full GC increase again. So the hope in this case would be 
> that enough heap is collected to never let the usage go above 3 GB 
> (assuming, of course, that that means all regions are at equal 
> occupancy of 75%). Am I understanding this correctly?
>
> Also, what is the additional (performance) cost incurred because of 
> setting the G1MixedGCLiveThresholdPercent value to 75%?
>
> Thanks once again - due to my misunderstanding, I was really not sure 
> what to do next!
>
> Regards,
> Srini.
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 7:54 PM, Yu Zhang <yu.zhang at oracle.com> 
> wrote:
>
>
> Srini,
>
> About -XX:G1MixedGCLiveThresholdPercent=65(default)
> If the region's live data is above 65%, this region will not be 
> considered as a candidate.
>
> In your case, you need to increase -XX:G1MixedGCLiveThresholdPercent.
> Thanks,
> Jenny
> On 8/6/2014 3:48 PM, Srini Padman wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am currently evaluating the use of the G1 Collector for our 
>> application, to combat the fragmentation issues we ran into while 
>> using the CMS collector (several cases of failed promotions, followed 
>> by *really* long pauses). However, I am also having trouble with 
>> tuning the G1 collector, and am seeing behavior that I can't fully 
>> understand. I will appreciate any help/insight that you guys can offer.
>>
>> What I find puzzling from looking at the G1 GC logs from our tests is 
>> that the concurrent marking phase does not really seem to identify 
>> many old regions to clean up at all, and the heap usage keeps 
>> growing. At some point, there is no further room to expand ("heap 
>> expansion operation failed") and this is followed by a Full GC that 
>> lasts about 10 seconds. But the Full GC actually brings the memory 
>> down by almost 50%, from 4095M to 2235M.
>>
>> If the Full GC can collect this much of the heap, I don't fully 
>> understand why the concurrent mark phase does not identify these 
>> (old?) regions for (mixed?) collection subsequently.
>>
>> On the assumption that we should let the GC ergonomics do its thing 
>> freely, I initially did not set any parameter other than -Xmx, -Xms, 
>> and the PermGen sizes. I added the G1HeapRegionSize and 
>> G1MixedGCLiveThresholdPercent settings (see below) because, when I 
>> saw the Full GCs with the default settings, I wondered whether we 
>> might be getting into a situation where all (or most?) regions are 
>> roughly 65% live so the concurrent marking phase does not identify 
>> them for collection but a subsequent Full GC is able to. That is, I 
>> wondered whether our application's heap footprint being 65% of the 
>> max heap led to these full GCs coincidentally (since 
>> G1MixedGCLiveThresholdPercent is 65% by default). But I don't know 
>> why the same thing happens when I set G1MixedGCLiveThresholdPercent 
>> down to 40% - even if all regions are 40% full, we will only be at 
>> about 1.6 GB, and that is far below what I think our heap footprint 
>> is in the long run (2.2 GB). So I don't understand how to ensure that 
>> old regions are cleaned up regularly so a Full GC is not required.
>>
>> GC Settings in use:
>>
>> -server -Xms4096m -Xmx4096m -Xss512k -XX:PermSize=128m 
>> -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:+ParallelRefProcEnabled 
>> -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintAdaptiveSizePolicy 
>> -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:G1HeapRegionSize=2m 
>> -XX:G1MixedGCLiveThresholdPercent=40
>>
>> This is using JRE 1.7.0_55.
>>
>> I am including a short(ish) GC log snippet for the time leading up to 
>> the Full GC. I can send the full GC log (about 8 MB, zipped) if 
>> necessary.
>>
>> Any help will be greatly appreciated!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Srini.
>>
>> ---------------------------
>>
>> 2014-08-06T04:46:00.067-0700: 1124501.033: [GC 
>> concurrent-root-region-scan-start]
>> 2014-08-06T04:46:00.081-0700: 1124501.047: [GC 
>> concurrent-root-region-scan-end, 0.0139487 secs]
>> 2014-08-06T04:46:00.081-0700: 1124501.047: [GC concurrent-mark-start]
>> 2014-08-06T04:46:10.531-0700: 1124511.514: [GC concurrent-mark-end, 
>> 10.4675249 secs]
>> 2014-08-06T04:46:10.532-0700: 1124511.515: [GC remark 
>> 2014-08-06T04:46:10.532-0700: 1124511.516: [GC ref-proc, 0.0018819 
>> secs], 0.0225253 secs]
>>  [Times: user=0.01 sys=0.00, real=0.02 secs]
>> 2014-08-06T04:46:10.555-0700: 1124511.539: [GC cleanup 
>> 3922M->3922M(4096M), 0.0098209 secs]
>>  [Times: user=0.03 sys=0.03, real=0.01 secs]
>> 2014-08-06T04:46:49.603-0700: 1124550.652: [GC pause (young)
>> Desired survivor size 13631488 bytes, new threshold 15 (max 15)
>> - age   1:    1531592 bytes,    1531592 total
>> - age   2:    1087648 bytes,    2619240 total
>> - age   3:     259480 bytes,    2878720 total
>> - age   4:     493976 bytes,    3372696 total
>> - age   5:     213472 bytes,    3586168 total
>> - age   6:     186104 bytes,    3772272 total
>> - age   7:     169832 bytes,    3942104 total
>> - age   8:     201968 bytes,    4144072 total
>> - age   9:     183752 bytes,    4327824 total
>> - age  10:     136480 bytes,    4464304 total
>> - age  11:     366208 bytes,    4830512 total
>> - age  12:     137296 bytes,    4967808 total
>> - age  13:     133592 bytes,    5101400 total
>> - age  14:     162232 bytes,    5263632 total
>> - age  15:     139984 bytes,    5403616 total
>>  1124550.652: [G1Ergonomics (CSet Construction) start choosing CSet, 
>> _pending_cards: 21647, predicted base time: 37.96 ms, remaining time: 
>> 162.04 ms, target pause time: 200.00 ms]
>>  1124550.652: [G1Ergonomics (CSet Construction) add young regions to 
>> CSet, eden: 95 regions, survivors: 7 regions, predicted young region 
>> time: 4.46 ms]
>>  1124550.652: [G1Ergonomics (CSet Construction) finish choosing CSet, 
>> eden: 95 regions, survivors: 7 regions, old: 0 regions, predicted 
>> pause time: 42.42 ms, target pause time: 200.00 ms]
>>  1124550.701: [G1Ergonomics (Concurrent Cycles) do not request 
>> concurrent cycle initiation, reason: still doing mixed collections, 
>> occupancy: 4064280576 bytes, allocation request: 0 bytes, threshold: 
>> 1932735240 bytes (45.00 %), source: end of GC]
>>  1124550.701: [G1Ergonomics (Mixed GCs) start mixed GCs, reason: 
>> candidate old regions available, candidate old regions: 285 regions, 
>> reclaimable: 430117688 bytes (10.01 %), threshold: 10.00 %]
>> , 0.0494015 secs]
>>    [Parallel Time: 43.7 ms, GC Workers: 4]
>>       [GC Worker Start (ms): Min: 1124550651.8, Avg: 1124550668.7, 
>> Max: 1124550674.3, Diff: 22.6]
>>       [Ext Root Scanning (ms): Min: 0.1, Avg: 6.7, Max: 22.3, Diff: 
>> 22.2, Sum: 26.8]
>>       [Update RS (ms): Min: 9.9, Avg: 11.0, Max: 12.3, Diff: 2.5, 
>> Sum: 44.0]
>>          [Processed Buffers: Min: 39, Avg: 40.3, Max: 41, Diff: 2, 
>> Sum: 161]
>>       [Scan RS (ms): Min: 0.0, Avg: 0.1, Max: 0.1, Diff: 0.1, Sum: 0.2]
>>       [Object Copy (ms): Min: 8.6, Avg: 8.9, Max: 9.6, Diff: 1.0, 
>> Sum: 35.6]
>>       [Termination (ms): Min: 0.1, Avg: 0.1, Max: 0.1, Diff: 0.0, 
>> Sum: 0.3]
>>       [GC Worker Other (ms): Min: 0.0, Avg: 0.0, Max: 0.1, Diff: 0.0, 
>> Sum: 0.2]
>>       [GC Worker Total (ms): Min: 21.1, Avg: 26.8, Max: 43.7, Diff: 
>> 22.6, Sum: 107.1]
>>       [GC Worker End (ms): Min: 1124550695.4, Avg: 1124550695.5, Max: 
>> 1124550695.5, Diff: 0.0]
>>    [Code Root Fixup: 0.0 ms]
>>    [Clear CT: 0.1 ms]
>>    [Other: 5.6 ms]
>>       [Choose CSet: 0.0 ms]
>>       [Ref Proc: 4.5 ms]
>>       [Ref Enq: 0.1 ms]
>>       [Free CSet: 0.3 ms]
>>    [Eden: 190.0M(190.0M)->0.0B(190.0M) Survivors: 14.0M->14.0M Heap: 
>> 4077.0M(4096.0M)->3887.1M(4096.0M)]
>>  [Times: user=0.11 sys=0.00, real=0.05 secs]
>> 2014-08-06T04:47:45.545-0700: 1124606.686: [GC pause (mixed)
>> Desired survivor size 13631488 bytes, new threshold 15 (max 15)
>> - age   1:    1323232 bytes,    1323232 total
>> - age   2:     716576 bytes,    2039808 total
>> - age   3:    1058584 bytes,    3098392 total
>> - age   4:     225208 bytes,    3323600 total
>> - age   5:     447688 bytes,    3771288 total
>> - age   6:     195112 bytes,    3966400 total
>> - age   7:     178000 bytes,    4144400 total
>> - age   8:     156904 bytes,    4301304 total
>> - age   9:     193424 bytes,    4494728 total
>> - age  10:     176272 bytes,    4671000 total
>> - age  11:     134768 bytes,    4805768 total
>> - age  12:     138896 bytes,    4944664 total
>> - age  13:     132272 bytes,    5076936 total
>> - age  14:     132856 bytes,    5209792 total
>> - age  15:     161912 bytes,    5371704 total
>>  1124606.686: [G1Ergonomics (CSet Construction) start choosing CSet, 
>> _pending_cards: 20335, predicted base time: 38.61 ms, remaining time: 
>> 161.39 ms, target pause time: 200.00 ms]
>>  1124606.686: [G1Ergonomics (CSet Construction) add young regions to 
>> CSet, eden: 95 regions, survivors: 7 regions, predicted young region 
>> time: 4.53 ms]
>>  1124606.686: [G1Ergonomics (CSet Construction) finish adding old 
>> regions to CSet, reason: reclaimable percentage not over threshold, 
>> old: 1 regions, max: 205 regions, reclaimable: 428818280 bytes (9.98 
>> %), threshold: 10.00 %]
>>  1124606.686: [G1Ergonomics (CSet Construction) finish choosing CSet, 
>> eden: 95 regions, survivors: 7 regions, old: 1 regions, predicted 
>> pause time: 45.72 ms, target pause time: 200.00 ms]
>>  1124606.731: [G1Ergonomics (Heap Sizing) attempt heap expansion, 
>> reason: region allocation request failed, allocation request: 1048576 
>> bytes]
>>  1124606.731: [G1Ergonomics (Heap Sizing) expand the heap, requested 
>> expansion amount: 1048576 bytes, attempted expansion amount: 2097152 
>> bytes]
>>  1124606.731: [G1Ergonomics (Heap Sizing) did not expand the heap, 
>> reason: heap expansion operation failed]
>>  1124606.743: [G1Ergonomics (Concurrent Cycles) do not request 
>> concurrent cycle initiation, reason: still doing mixed collections, 
>> occupancy: 4095737856 bytes, allocation request: 0 bytes, threshold: 
>> 1932735240 bytes (45.00 %), source: end of GC]
>>  1124606.743: [G1Ergonomics (Mixed GCs) do not continue mixed GCs, 
>> reason: reclaimable percentage not over threshold, candidate old 
>> regions: 284 regions, reclaimable: 428818280 bytes (9.98 %), 
>> threshold: 10.00 %]
>>  (to-space exhausted), 0.0568178 secs]
>>    [Parallel Time: 40.4 ms, GC Workers: 4]
>>       [GC Worker Start (ms): Min: 1124606686.1, Avg: 1124606701.7, 
>> Max: 1124606723.8, Diff: 37.7]
>>       [Ext Root Scanning (ms): Min: 0.1, Avg: 6.3, Max: 16.1, Diff: 
>> 16.1, Sum: 25.4]
>>       [Update RS (ms): Min: 0.0, Avg: 9.6, Max: 13.3, Diff: 13.3, 
>> Sum: 38.6]
>>          [Processed Buffers: Min: 0, Avg: 37.5, Max: 52, Diff: 52, 
>> Sum: 150]
>>       [Scan RS (ms): Min: 0.0, Avg: 0.3, Max: 0.4, Diff: 0.4, Sum: 1.1]
>>       [Object Copy (ms): Min: 2.6, Avg: 8.4, Max: 11.1, Diff: 8.5, 
>> Sum: 33.7]
>>       [Termination (ms): Min: 0.0, Avg: 0.0, Max: 0.0, Diff: 0.0, 
>> Sum: 0.0]
>>       [GC Worker Other (ms): Min: 0.0, Avg: 0.0, Max: 0.0, Diff: 0.0, 
>> Sum: 0.1]
>>       [GC Worker Total (ms): Min: 2.7, Avg: 24.7, Max: 40.4, Diff: 
>> 37.7, Sum: 98.9]
>>       [GC Worker End (ms): Min: 1124606726.5, Avg: 1124606726.5, Max: 
>> 1124606726.5, Diff: 0.0]
>>    [Code Root Fixup: 0.0 ms]
>>    [Clear CT: 0.1 ms]
>>    [Other: 16.3 ms]
>>       [Choose CSet: 0.0 ms]
>>       [Ref Proc: 7.7 ms]
>>       [Ref Enq: 0.2 ms]
>>       [Free CSet: 0.3 ms]
>>    [Eden: 190.0M(190.0M)->0.0B(188.0M) Survivors: 14.0M->16.0M Heap: 
>> 4077.1M(4096.0M)->3921.6M(4096.0M)]
>>  [Times: user=0.11 sys=0.00, real=0.06 secs]
>> 2014-08-06T04:49:57.698-0700: 1124739.058: [GC pause (young)
>> Desired survivor size 13631488 bytes, new threshold 15 (max 15)
>> - age   1:    1130192 bytes,    1130192 total
>> - age   2:     492816 bytes,    1623008 total
>> - age   3:     675240 bytes,    2298248 total
>> - age   4:    1038536 bytes,    3336784 total
>> - age   5:     208048 bytes,    3544832 total
>> - age   6:     436520 bytes,    3981352 total
>> - age   7:     184528 bytes,    4165880 total
>> - age   8:     165376 bytes,    4331256 total
>> - age   9:     154872 bytes,    4486128 total
>> - age  10:     179016 bytes,    4665144 total
>> - age  11:     167760 bytes,    4832904 total
>> - age  12:     132056 bytes,    4964960 total
>> - age  13:     138736 bytes,    5103696 total
>> - age  14:     132080 bytes,    5235776 total
>> - age  15:     132856 bytes,    5368632 total
>>  1124739.058: [G1Ergonomics (CSet Construction) start choosing CSet, 
>> _pending_cards: 44501, predicted base time: 51.94 ms, remaining time: 
>> 148.06 ms, target pause time: 200.00 ms]
>>  1124739.058: [G1Ergonomics (CSet Construction) add young regions to 
>> CSet, eden: 87 regions, survivors: 8 regions, predicted young region 
>> time: 4.37 ms]
>>  1124739.058: [G1Ergonomics (CSet Construction) finish choosing CSet, 
>> eden: 87 regions, survivors: 8 regions, old: 0 regions, predicted 
>> pause time: 56.32 ms, target pause time: 200.00 ms]
>>  1124739.060: [G1Ergonomics (Heap Sizing) attempt heap expansion, 
>> reason: region allocation request failed, allocation request: 1048576 
>> bytes]
>>  1124739.060: [G1Ergonomics (Heap Sizing) expand the heap, requested 
>> expansion amount: 1048576 bytes, attempted expansion amount: 2097152 
>> bytes]
>>  1124739.060: [G1Ergonomics (Heap Sizing) did not expand the heap, 
>> reason: heap expansion operation failed]
>>  1124739.252: [G1Ergonomics (Concurrent Cycles) request concurrent 
>> cycle initiation, reason: occupancy higher than threshold, occupancy: 
>> 4294967296 bytes, allocation request: 0 bytes, threshold: 1932735240 
>> bytes (45.00 %), source: end of GC]
>>  (to-space exhausted), 0.1936102 secs]
>>    [Parallel Time: 146.6 ms, GC Workers: 4]
>>       [GC Worker Start (ms): Min: 1124739058.5, Avg: 1124739061.6, 
>> Max: 1124739063.0, Diff: 4.4]
>>       [Ext Root Scanning (ms): Min: 0.2, Avg: 7.0, Max: 14.3, Diff: 
>> 14.0, Sum: 28.2]
>>       [Update RS (ms): Min: 4.8, Avg: 10.7, Max: 17.6, Diff: 12.8, 
>> Sum: 42.7]
>>          [Processed Buffers: Min: 47, Avg: 56.3, Max: 69, Diff: 22, 
>> Sum: 225]
>>       [Scan RS (ms): Min: 0.0, Avg: 0.0, Max: 0.1, Diff: 0.0, Sum: 0.2]
>>       [Object Copy (ms): Min: 113.1, Avg: 125.6, Max: 137.6, Diff: 
>> 24.5, Sum: 502.5]
>>       [Termination (ms): Min: 0.0, Avg: 0.0, Max: 0.1, Diff: 0.1, 
>> Sum: 0.2]
>>       [GC Worker Other (ms): Min: 0.0, Avg: 0.0, Max: 0.0, Diff: 0.0, 
>> Sum: 0.1]
>>       [GC Worker Total (ms): Min: 142.1, Avg: 143.5, Max: 146.5, 
>> Diff: 4.4, Sum: 573.8]
>>       [GC Worker End (ms): Min: 1124739205.1, Avg: 1124739205.1, Max: 
>> 1124739205.1, Diff: 0.0]
>>    [Code Root Fixup: 0.0 ms]
>>    [Clear CT: 0.1 ms]
>>    [Other: 46.9 ms]
>>       [Choose CSet: 0.0 ms]
>>       [Ref Proc: 1.0 ms]
>>       [Ref Enq: 0.1 ms]
>>       [Free CSet: 0.2 ms]
>>    [Eden: 174.0M(188.0M)->0.0B(204.0M) Survivors: 16.0M->0.0B Heap: 
>> 4095.6M(4096.0M)->4095.6M(4096.0M)]
>>  [Times: user=0.36 sys=0.00, real=0.19 secs]
>>  1124739.259: [G1Ergonomics (Concurrent Cycles) initiate concurrent 
>> cycle, reason: concurrent cycle initiation requested]
>> 2014-08-06T04:49:57.898-0700: 1124739.259: [GC pause (young) 
>> (initial-mark)
>> Desired survivor size 13631488 bytes, new threshold 15 (max 15)
>>  1124739.259: [G1Ergonomics (CSet Construction) start choosing CSet, 
>> _pending_cards: 322560, predicted base time: 205.33 ms, remaining 
>> time: 0.00 ms, target pause time: 200.00 ms]
>>  1124739.259: [G1Ergonomics (CSet Construction) add young regions to 
>> CSet, eden: 0 regions, survivors: 0 regions, predicted young region 
>> time: 0.00 ms]
>>  1124739.259: [G1Ergonomics (CSet Construction) finish choosing CSet, 
>> eden: 0 regions, survivors: 0 regions, old: 0 regions, predicted 
>> pause time: 205.33 ms, target pause time: 200.00 ms]
>> , 0.0347198 secs]
>>    [Parallel Time: 33.1 ms, GC Workers: 4]
>>       [GC Worker Start (ms): Min: 1124739259.3, Avg: 1124739259.3, 
>> Max: 1124739259.3, Diff: 0.0]
>>       [Ext Root Scanning (ms): Min: 5.5, Avg: 7.7, Max: 11.0, Diff: 
>> 5.4, Sum: 30.6]
>>       [Update RS (ms): Min: 18.4, Avg: 19.8, Max: 20.6, Diff: 2.2, 
>> Sum: 79.4]
>>          [Processed Buffers: Min: 293, Avg: 315.3, Max: 350, Diff: 
>> 57, Sum: 1261]
>>       [Scan RS (ms): Min: 0.0, Avg: 0.0, Max: 0.0, Diff: 0.0, Sum: 0.0]
>>       [Object Copy (ms): Min: 1.6, Avg: 5.4, Max: 6.9, Diff: 5.3, 
>> Sum: 21.7]
>>       [Termination (ms): Min: 0.0, Avg: 0.1, Max: 0.1, Diff: 0.1, 
>> Sum: 0.4]
>>       [GC Worker Other (ms): Min: 0.0, Avg: 0.0, Max: 0.0, Diff: 0.0, 
>> Sum: 0.1]
>>       [GC Worker Total (ms): Min: 33.0, Avg: 33.0, Max: 33.1, Diff: 
>> 0.1, Sum: 132.1]
>>       [GC Worker End (ms): Min: 1124739292.3, Avg: 1124739292.3, Max: 
>> 1124739292.3, Diff: 0.0]
>>    [Code Root Fixup: 0.0 ms]
>>    [Clear CT: 0.1 ms]
>>    [Other: 1.5 ms]
>>       [Choose CSet: 0.0 ms]
>>       [Ref Proc: 1.0 ms]
>>       [Ref Enq: 0.1 ms]
>>       [Free CSet: 0.0 ms]
>>    [Eden: 0.0B(204.0M)->0.0B(204.0M) Survivors: 0.0B->0.0B Heap: 
>> 4095.6M(4096.0M)->4095.6M(4096.0M)]
>>  [Times: user=0.12 sys=0.00, real=0.04 secs]
>> 2014-08-06T04:49:57.933-0700: 1124739.294: [GC 
>> concurrent-root-region-scan-start]
>> 2014-08-06T04:49:57.933-0700: 1124739.294: [GC 
>> concurrent-root-region-scan-end, 0.0000157 secs]
>> 2014-08-06T04:49:57.933-0700: 1124739.294: [GC concurrent-mark-start]
>>  1124739.295: [G1Ergonomics (Heap Sizing) attempt heap expansion, 
>> reason: allocation request failed, allocation request: 80 bytes]
>>  1124739.295: [G1Ergonomics (Heap Sizing) expand the heap, requested 
>> expansion amount: 2097152 bytes, attempted expansion amount: 2097152 
>> bytes]
>>  1124739.295: [G1Ergonomics (Heap Sizing) did not expand the heap, 
>> reason: heap expansion operation failed]
>> 2014-08-06T04:49:57.934-0700: 1124739.295: [Full GC 
>> 4095M->2235M(4096M), 10.5341003 secs]
>>    [Eden: 0.0B(204.0M)->0.0B(1436.0M) Survivors: 0.0B->0.0B Heap: 
>> 4095.6M(4096.0M)->2235.4M(4096.0M)]
>>  [Times: user=13.20 sys=0.03, real=10.52 secs]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> hotspot-gc-use mailing list
>> hotspot-gc-use at openjdk.java.net  <mailto:hotspot-gc-use at openjdk.java.net>
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/hotspot-gc-use
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hotspot-gc-use mailing list
> hotspot-gc-use at openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/hotspot-gc-use



More information about the hotspot-gc-use mailing list