RFR: 8310661: JFR: Replace JVM.getJVM() with JVM
Erik Gahlin
egahlin at openjdk.org
Fri Jun 30 12:13:14 UTC 2023
Could I have a review of a change that makes instance methods in the JVM class static.
Today some methods are static, others are not, which means the JVM object needs to be stored and passed around. A singleton object may have made sense in JDK 8 so JVM::getJVM() could be made caller sensitive, similar to Unsafe::getUnsafe(), but not anymore. The jdk.jfr.internal package is protected by the module system.
Testing: jdk/jdk/jfr tier1 + tier2
Thanks
Erik
-------------
Commit messages:
- Initial
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14713/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=14713&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310661
Stats: 406 lines in 36 files changed: 25 ins; 72 del; 309 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14713.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14713/head:pull/14713
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14713
More information about the hotspot-jfr-dev
mailing list