RFR: 8307488: Incorrect weight of the first ObjectAllocationSample JFR event [v2]
Aleksey Shipilev
shade at openjdk.org
Tue May 30 09:37:05 UTC 2023
On Fri, 26 May 2023 11:05:22 GMT, Markus Grönlund <mgronlun at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> this PR fixes the problem with incorrect weights attribution for the initial ObjectAllocationSample event.
>>
>> Testing: jdk_jfr
>>
>> Thanks
>> Markus
>
> Markus Grönlund has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> variable rename
src/hotspot/share/jfr/recorder/service/jfrRecorderService.cpp line 146:
> 144: iterate(jit, coas);
> 145: JfrNonJavaThreadIterator njit;
> 146: iterate(njit, coas);
Apologies for the post-integration review, but I have a question/suggestion. This code retains the JavaThread iterator while NonJavaThreadIterator is running, which feels unnecessary. Also, if we have thousands of threads, walking these threads and doing the unconditional `clear_last_allocated_bytes` there seems redundant and heavy-weight if the relevant JFR event is off.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14158#discussion_r1210007990
More information about the hotspot-jfr-dev
mailing list