Request for review (S)

[Tom Rodriguez]

This looks ok to me.

tom

On May 24, 2010, at 8:55 AM, Keith McGuigan wrote:

> 
> Bug Link: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6930553
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kamg/6930553/webrev.01/
> 
> Summary:
> For classfiles >= 51, check NameAndType_info constant pools entries more aggressively to make sure the signature is valid, even if the entry is not referenced by a Field, Method, or InterfaceMethod ref entry. This is required by the spec.
> 
> Thanks for any review!
> 
> --
> - Keith
>