Code Review 7110017: is_headless_jre should be updated to reflect the new,location of awt toolkit libraries

[David Holmes]

Pinging runtime! One more Reviewer please.

Thanks,
David

On 11/11/2011 9:11 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Thanks for contributing the changes. I've applied them and tested them
> so it is a Thumbs Up from me.
>
> We need one further Reviewer from runtime.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On 11/11/2011 9:12 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>
>> With the changes proposed by CR 7110002: "Rename xawt/libmawt.so and
>> headless/libmawt.so so they can be colocated with libawt",
>> os::is_headless_jre() will have to be updated to look for the renamed
>> awt toolkit libraries. See the discussion on awt-dev for further
>> information:
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2011-November/002026.html
>>
>> The check for the motif toolkit can also be removed as the motif based
>> toolkit has been removed in JDK7.
>>
>> Since is_headless_jre is checking is for headless and short circuits
>> and returns false ( headed ) if it finds any headed library we can
>> just check for the existence of either the new or old library, without
>> JDK version specific code. If either exists then it is a headed
>> environment.
>>
>> Webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/7110017/webrev/
>>
>> -Chris.
>>
>> P.S. Thanks to David Holmes for helping drive this on the vm side.