Request for review: 7102489: RFE: cleanup jlong typedef on __APPLE__ and _LP64 systems
Vladimir Kozlov
vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Fri Jan 11 14:46:52 PST 2013
Thank you, Harold, for explanation. Changes are good.
Vladimir
On 1/11/13 6:36 AM, harold seigel wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> Thank you for your comments. Mac OS defines int64_t as 'long long'.
> So, int64_t needs a different format specifier than jlong, which this
> fix now defines as 'long'. This is because, as shown below, the Mac OS
> C++ compiler is picky about format specifiers for values of types 'long
> long' and 'long'.
>
> $ gcc lld.cpp
> lld.cpp: In function int main(int, char**):
> lld.cpp:8: warning: format %lld expects type long long int, but
> argument 2 has type long int
> lld.cpp:9: warning: format %ld expects type long int, but argument 2
> has type int64_t
>
> $ cat lld.cpp
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
>
> int main(int argc, char * argv[]) {
> long long_val = 5;
> int64_t int64_val = 8;
> printf("long_val: %ld\n", long_val);
> printf("long_val: %lld\n", long_val); <---- Line 8
> printf("int64_val: %ld\n", int64_val); <--- Line 9
> printf("int64_val: %lld\n", int64_val);
> return 0;
> }
>
> That is why I added JLONG_FORMAT.
>
> Thanks, Harold
>
> On 1/10/2013 9:46 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Can we just define INT64_FORMAT as platform specific and use it
>> instead of adding new JLONG_FORMAT?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vladimir
>>
>> On 1/10/13 10:39 AM, harold seigel wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review the following changes to fix bug 7102489.
>>>
>>> Summary:
>>> The definition of type jlong differed on Mac OS from the other 64 bit
>>> platforms. This fix makes it consistent. In order to do this, this fix
>>> defines new macros, JLONG_FORMAT and JULONG_FORMAT, for printing and
>>> scanning jlongs and julongs.
>>>
>>> This fix also does some cleanup. Methods jlong_format_specifier() and
>>> julong_format_specifer() were removed and some format specifiers were
>>> replaced with appropriate macros.
>>>
>>> Open webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_7102489/
>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ehseigel/bug_7102489/>
>>> Bug link at http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7102489
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Harold
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list