Request for review: 8006629: NEED_TEST: need test for JDK-8001071

[Filipp Zhinkin]

Here is an updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/8001071/webrev.01/

All code related to BIT_FLAG was removed and BIT_FLAG was replaced by 
TESTVMOPTS.

Thanks,
Filipp.

On 01/23/2013 12:59 PM, Filipp Zhinkin wrote:
> Vladimir,
>
> thanks for reply!I'll fix it.
>
> Filipp.
>
> On 01/22/2013 11:02 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Filipp,
>>
>> You should never use BIT_FLAG! You should use ${TESTVMOPTS} to test 
>> correct VM.
>>
>> Vladimir
>>
>> On 1/21/13 3:19 AM, Filipp Zhinkin wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Would someone review the following regression test please?
>>>
>>> Test checks that debug VM will crashed on assert if offset
>>> passed to Unsafe's access methods is bigger than object size.
>>>
>>> To ensure that it is true, shell script execute Test8001071
>>> which tries to get object from huge offset.
>>>
>>> Only one Unsafe's method is checked because all other
>>> methods uses the same mechanism to get OOP from object
>>> using passed offset.
>>>
>>> Test passes only if hs_err_pid* file created and it contains
>>> tested assert. Test will also pass if product VM is tested.
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/8001071/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Filipp.
>