RFR (M) : JDK-8016029 : test runtime/6878713/Test6878713.sh failed

[John Rose]

Good; thanks, Misha.  — John

On Jul 18, 2013, at 12:55 PM, Mikhailo Seledtsov <mikhailo.seledtsov at oracle.com> wrote:

> Hi John, Coleen, 
> 
>   John, thank you for the advice on using jdk.internal.org.objectweb.asm.*. I did not know about this capability. 
> Hopefully we can use this approach in this particular test, as well as other similar tests. This could be a great help for rewriting the bytecode based tests in a source form. In case if for some reason it does not work out, I will include the jasm as a separate file, with my comments.  
>   Unfortunately the source jasm file was not available for this test, only a jar file. This is the case for many other similar byte-code based tests. I did use tools to disassemble the jar into a jasm, in order to look at it and to understand what the code does. Hence, the only jasm I could include is the reverse-engineered one; however I agree that it is still better than having binary in the source, since I can include some comments with jasm code explaining what it does.