Access Checking for MethodHandles.Lookup broken?
Sebastian Sickelmann
sebastian.sickelmann at gmx.de
Thu Nov 21 23:33:19 PST 2013
Hi,
i found a strage behavior while using invokeDynamic and binding to field
instances with findGetter and findSetter.
See here for the code:
https://github.com/picpromusic/incubator/tree/master/jdk/methodHandles
There is a class BarBase with a private field and two classes
- Bar (which extends BarBase)
- Foo (which extends Bar)
If i create a Lookup for the class Foo and lookup a field with the name
of the private field of BarBase like this:
fooLookup.findGetter(BarBase.class, "myPrivateField", int.class);
I get an IllegalAccessException as expected.
If i look it up with another searchRoot
fooLookup.findGetter(Base.class, "myPrivateField", int.class);
I also get an IllegalAccessException.
A NoSuchFieldException would also be nice, but because this mimics the
semantics of
super.publicFieldInSuperClass versus this.publicFieldInSuperClass
(yields to differend bytecodes) i can life with this minor glitch.
But if i try to lookup the field with something like this:
fooLookup.findGetter(Foo.class, "myPrivateField", int.class);
I do not get an IllegalAccessException ( and as expected also no
NoSuchFieldException).
I even can access the field through this MethodHandle.
Should i file a bug for this? Or is this intentional?
I think it is a bug, and it look to me that it is in
MethodHandleNatives.resolve where the field lookup is made through the
hirachie but the access-check is done with the searchRoot (in this case
Foo.class) ?
I have not take a closer look to the native MethodHandleNative.resolve
but i will in the near future and work toward a fix of this.
-- Sebastian
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list