RFR(XS): 8055164 - [TESTBUG] runtime/CompressedOops/CompressedClassPointers.java fails with OpenJDK build

harold seigel harold.seigel at oracle.com
Wed Aug 20 15:58:13 UTC 2014


Hi Christian,

The new version looks good to me, also.

Harold

On 8/20/2014 11:57 AM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>
> It was an oversight (bug).  Yes, I was trying to verify that -version 
> came out.  The new version looks fine.
>
> Coleen
>
> On 8/20/14, 11:51 AM, Christian Tornqvist wrote:
>> Hi Harold,
>>
>> I guess the author of the test wanted to verify that we got -version
>> correctly. Not sure if this something we'd have to worry about though.
>> Pinging Coleen since she wrote the original test.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Christian
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: hotspot-runtime-dev
>> [mailto:hotspot-runtime-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of 
>> harold
>> seigel
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:03 AM
>> To: hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: RFR(XS): 8055164 - [TESTBUG]
>> runtime/CompressedOops/CompressedClassPointers.java fails with 
>> OpenJDK build
>>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> Any idea why the test included a check for "Hotspot" in the output?
>>
>> Thanks, Harold
>>
>> On 8/20/2014 9:34 AM, Christian Tornqvist wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>>
>>> Small test fix for an issue where the test fails when running with an
>>> OpenJDK build, this is because the test is specifically looking for
>>> "HotSpot" in the -version output. Fix has been tested using JPRT to
>>> build and run the test with an OpenJDK build.
>>>
>>>
>>> Webrev:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ctornqvi/webrev/8055164/webrev.00/
>>>
>>>
>>> Bug:
>>>
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055164
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>
>



More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list