[9] RFR (S) 6762191: Setting stack size to 16K causes segmentation fault

serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
Fri Dec 5 00:38:35 UTC 2014


It still looks good to me too. :)

Thanks,
Serguei

On 12/4/14 3:46 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Looks good to me too Chris - sorry for the delay getting back to you. 
> But at least Kumar spotted all the typos :)
>
> David
>
> On 4/12/2014 6:12 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> On 12/3/14 4:56 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 02/12/2014 02:39, Chris Plummer wrote:
>>>> Sorry about the long delay in getting back to this. I ran into two
>>>> separate JPRT issues that were preventing me from testing these
>>>> changes, plus I was on vacation last week. Here's an updated webrev.
>>>> I'm not sure where we left things, so I'll just say what's changed
>>>> since the original version:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Rewrote the test to be in Java instead of a shell script.
>>>> 2. Moved the test from hotspot/test/runtime/memory to
>>>> jdk/test/tools/launcher
>>>> 3. Added STACK_SIZE_MINIMUM to java.c, allowing a makefile to
>>>> override the default 32k minimum value.
>>>>
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6762191
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/6762191/webrev.02/
>>> This looks to me. A minor comment for java.c is that this code uses
>>> 4-space indent (different to hotspot).
>>>
>>> The test looks okay too, you might just checking the copyright date as
>>> I assume was not written in 2010. Also I think the import of
>>> java.io.File may be left behind from the previous round.
>>>
>>> -Alan
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> While removing the java.io.File import, I also questioned why I had
>> java.io.IOException being imported. There were a couple of methods that
>> declared it thrown, and the main method therefore had to catch it, but
>> it turns out this was just copy/paste from the Settings.java test I used
>> as a template, and is not actually needed. I removed the import, throws,
>> and try/catch of IOException.
>>
>> All the other issues mentioned by others have also been addressed. A new
>> webrev can be found at:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/6762191/webrev.03/
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Chris



More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list