RFR (XXS) resolve atomic.hpp wording issues from JDK-8047104 code review (8049104)

Karen Kinnear karen.kinnear at oracle.com
Thu Jul 10 14:20:14 UTC 2014


I am good with the wording. This matches my understanding of the memory barriers for the atomics.
Thank you for researching this so carefully.

thanks,
Karen

On Jul 9, 2014, at 7:33 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:

> Thanks for the review!
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> On 7/9/14 5:05 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>> Thumbs up!
>> 
>> Thanks Dan!
>> 
>> David
>> 
>> On 10/07/2014 1:52 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>> 
>>> I have the fix for the following bug ready for JDK9 RT_Baseline:
>>> 
>>>     JDK-8049104 resolve atomic.hpp wording issues from JDK-8047104
>>>                 code review
>>>     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8049104
>>> 
>>> Here is the URL for the webrev:
>>> 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/8049104-webrev/0-jdk9-hs-rt/
>>> 
>>> Testing:
>>> 
>>> - These are comment only changes. Earlier versions of these changes
>>>   were included in the testing for JDK-8047104.
>>> 
>>> Thanks, in advance, for any comments, questions or suggestions.
>>> 
>>> Dan
> 



More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list