RFR (XXS) resolve atomic.hpp wording issues from JDK-8047104 code review (8049104)
Karen Kinnear
karen.kinnear at oracle.com
Thu Jul 10 14:20:14 UTC 2014
I am good with the wording. This matches my understanding of the memory barriers for the atomics.
Thank you for researching this so carefully.
thanks,
Karen
On Jul 9, 2014, at 7:33 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> Thanks for the review!
>
> Dan
>
>
> On 7/9/14 5:05 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>> Thumbs up!
>>
>> Thanks Dan!
>>
>> David
>>
>> On 10/07/2014 1:52 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I have the fix for the following bug ready for JDK9 RT_Baseline:
>>>
>>> JDK-8049104 resolve atomic.hpp wording issues from JDK-8047104
>>> code review
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8049104
>>>
>>> Here is the URL for the webrev:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/8049104-webrev/0-jdk9-hs-rt/
>>>
>>> Testing:
>>>
>>> - These are comment only changes. Earlier versions of these changes
>>> were included in the testing for JDK-8047104.
>>>
>>> Thanks, in advance, for any comments, questions or suggestions.
>>>
>>> Dan
>
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list