RFR (XXS) resolve atomic.hpp wording issues from JDK-8047104 code review (8049104)

[Daniel D. Daugherty]

Thanks for the review!

Dan


On 7/10/14 8:20 AM, Karen Kinnear wrote:
> I am good with the wording. This matches my understanding of the memory barriers for the atomics.
> Thank you for researching this so carefully.
>
> thanks,
> Karen
>
> On Jul 9, 2014, at 7:33 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the review!
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On 7/9/14 5:05 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>>> Thumbs up!
>>>
>>> Thanks Dan!
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> On 10/07/2014 1:52 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>>> Greetings,
>>>>
>>>> I have the fix for the following bug ready for JDK9 RT_Baseline:
>>>>
>>>>      JDK-8049104 resolve atomic.hpp wording issues from JDK-8047104
>>>>                  code review
>>>>      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8049104
>>>>
>>>> Here is the URL for the webrev:
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/8049104-webrev/0-jdk9-hs-rt/
>>>>
>>>> Testing:
>>>>
>>>> - These are comment only changes. Earlier versions of these changes
>>>>    were included in the testing for JDK-8047104.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, in advance, for any comments, questions or suggestions.
>>>>
>>>> Dan