RFR (S/M) expose L1_data_cache_line_size for diagnostic/sanity checks (8049717)

[Daniel D. Daugherty]

Greetings,

I've tweaked the fix based on Vladimir's feedback.

Here is the URL for the second round webrev:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/8049717-webrev/1-jdk9-hs-rt/

The following files changed between round 0 and round 1:

src/cpu/sparc/vm/vm_version_sparc.cpp
src/cpu/x86/vm/vm_version_x86.cpp
src/cpu/x86/vm/vm_version_x86.hpp
src/share/vm/runtime/objectMonitor.cpp
src/share/vm/runtime/synchronizer.cpp

Thanks, in advance, for any comments, questions or suggestions.

Dan


On 7/9/14 10:42 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have the fix for the following bug ready for JDK9 RT_Baseline:
>
>     JDK-8049717 expose L1_data_cache_line_size for diagnostic/sanity
>                 checks
>     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8049717
>
> Here is the URL for the webrev:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/8049717-webrev/0-jdk9-hs-rt/
>
> This fix is a standalone piece from my Contended Locking reorder
> and cache-line bucket. I've split it off as an independent bug fix
> in order to make the reorder and cache-line bucket more clear.
>
> Testing:
>
> - JPRT test jobs
> - manual testing of the new output via existing options:
>   -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:SyncKnobs=Verbose=1
>   -XX:+ExecuteInternalVMTests -XX:+VerboseInternalVMTests
> - Aurora Adhoc nsk.sajdi and vm.parallel_class_loading as part of
>   testing for my Contended Locking reorder and cache-line bucket
>
> Thanks, in advance, for any comments, questions or suggestions.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>