RFR: JDK-8029776 - Solaris code cleanup

Volker Simonis volker.simonis at gmail.com
Tue Mar 4 17:38:20 UTC 2014


Hi Gerald,

thanks for providing the bug description.

For this bug I think that's not really a problem because the synopsis
as well as the change itself are already quite straight forward.

My comment was intended more as a general hint to raise the awareness
such that people don't create confidential bugs if this is not
absolutely necessary.

Also the fact that for some reason it seems to impossible to "open" a
bug which was once flagged as "confidential" seems unnecessarily
restrictive to me.

All this makes it sometimes very hard for the community (but also for
licensees) to understand what's going on. And this is not just the
missing description during a review, but also the information when and
to which repository a fix is integrated, which backports exist and so
on. That's all very important and useful information for people
outside Oracle which build their own OpenJDK/Java distribution.

Thanks,
Volker


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Gerald Thornbrugh
<gerald.thornbrugh at oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi Volker,
>
> The bug is not visible because it was inadvertently marked as confidential.
> Since changing it from confidential to an open state is not a reasonable
> option I will just state the description of the bug fix.
>
> JDK-8029776 describes JDK8 Solaris specific code cleanup to address
> possible unclosed file descriptors, to make array indexes more readable
> and make sure functions return values.
>
> Does this help?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Gerald Thornbrugh
>
>
>> Hi Gerald,
>>
>> the bug is not visible. Could you please fix this.
>>
>> Thank you and best regards,
>> Volker
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Gerald Thornbrugh
>> <gerald.thornbrugh at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am a member of the Oracle Hotspot group and there is an initiative to
>>> clean up
>>> things like uninitialized variables and unclosed file descriptors in
>>> JDK8.
>>> This is a
>>> backport of fixes that have already been putback into JDK9. I have run
>>> UTE
>>> and
>>> JPRT tests on Solaris machines without proflems. The below webrev show
>>> the
>>> fixes for
>>> the Solaris area.
>>>
>>> Bug:
>>>
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029776
>>>
>>> Webrev:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/for_gthornbr/8029775-webrev/0-jdk8u-hs-dev/
>>>
>>> Please review my changes and let me know if you have questions.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Gerald Thornbrugh
>
>


More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list