RFR: JDK-8033464 and JDK-8033931 - Linux code cleanup

[Gerald Thornbrugh]

Hi Dan,

Thanks for the review.

Gerald
> > 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/for_gthornbr/8033464-webrev/1-jdk8u-hs-dev/ 
>
>
> Thumbs up.
>
> This time I compared the diffs for these two changesets from JDK9:
>
> changeset:   5879:c2626e4f0c80
> user:        dcubed
> date:        Fri Feb 07 11:47:24 2014 -0800
> summary:     8033931: Several nightly tests failing with assert(imin < 
> imax) fai
> led: Unexpected page size
>
> changeset:   5875:2c2a99f6cf83
> parent:      5871:c86519f8d826
> user:        coleenp
> date:        Thu Feb 06 14:28:35 2014 -0500
> summary:     8029775: Solaris code cleanup
>
> with the patch. The only differences are white space, timestamps
> and diff context anchors.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On 3/24/14 1:47 PM, Gerald Thornbrugh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am a member of the Oracle Hotspot group and there is an initiative 
>> to clean up
>> things like uninitialized variables and unclosed file descriptors in 
>> JDK8. This is a
>> backport of fixes that have already been putback into JDK9. I have 
>> run UTE and
>> JPRT tests on Linux machines without problems. The below webrev show 
>> the fixes for
>> the Linux area.
>>
>> Bugs:
>>
>> JDK-8033464 is not visible because it has been marked as Oracle 
>> confidential.
>>
>> JDK-8033464 describes a JDK8 Linux specific code cleanup to address
>> possible uninitialized variables and unclosed file descriptors. These 
>> issues
>> were addressed in the fix.
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033464
>>
>> JDK-8033931 is a JDK9 issue with an assert that was putback as part 
>> of the
>> fix for JDK-8033464.  It will also be addressed with this putback.
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033931
>>
>> Webrev:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/for_gthornbr/8033464-webrev/1-jdk8u-hs-dev/ 
>>
>>
>>
>> Please review my changes and let me know if you have questions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gerald Thornbrugh
>