How are stacks of non-JavaThreads guarded?
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Tue Dec 1 05:30:29 UTC 2015
On 30/11/2015 11:09 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:54 PM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com
> <mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> On 30/11/2015 5:01 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com
> <mailto:aph at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On 28/11/15 07:55, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>
> So, in JavaThread we establish stack guards (red and
> yellow zones). But I
> do not find anything similar for non JavaThread threads,
> e.g. VmThread?
>
>
> There isn't, and I don't think it's possible because there is no
> reasonably portable way to recover from a stack overflow in C++.
>
>
> thanks for clarifying.
>
> But I don't even want to recover; a hard-and-fast crash is
> better than
> running over whatever happens to be below the VmThread stack. Well,
> something to mull over.
>
>
> You will run into the libc guard pages as I understand it and get
> your hard-and-fast crash.
>
>
> On AIX I disable the OS guard pages. That was the reason for my original
> question. I guess I have
> to revert this and analyze the original problem I tried to solve back
> when I disabled the guard pages.
Sorry missed that. Yes we still want the OS guard pages in general.
David
> Kind Regards, Thomas
>
> The Java thread guard pages are for recovery purposes.
>
> David
> -----
>
> Regards, Thomas
>
>
>
> Andrew.
>
>
>
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list