RFR 8068730: Increase the precision of the implementation of java.time.Clock.systemUTC()
staffan.larsen at oracle.com
Fri Jan 16 11:46:47 UTC 2015
> On 13 jan 2015, at 13:26, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> On 13/01/2015 7:53 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> On 13/01/15 04:52, David Holmes wrote:
>>>> Here is the new webrev with Stephen & your feedback included
>>>> (windows_time_stamp not renamed yet)
>>> I checked the updated webrev.02 and everything looks good on the hotspot
>>> What are your plans for pushing this?
>> Thanks David,
>> My understanding is that I'll need to push that through hs-rt - since
>> it has changes for hotspot. I believe I'll need two reviewers - is that
>> right? Roger Riggs has also reviewed the changes on core-libs-dev, so
>> is this good to go, or do both reviewers need to be members of the hsx
> hsx project is defunct, so technically we're all just jdk9 reviewers, but we still like two reviews from hotspot team members.
I’ve looked at the hotspot changes: Looks good!
>> Also - I am not sure whether I need a sponsor (I have never pushed
>> anything to hs-rt - I usually push in jdk9-dev) or whether I am
>> allowed to push this myself (I'll use jprt in that case).
> If you are a jdk9 committer then you can push yourself via jprt - full forest submission from top-level: "jprt submit -forest -testset hotspot"
>> best regards,
>> -- daniel
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev