RFR (S): 8072588 - JVM crashes in JNI if toString is declared as an interface method

Stefan Karlsson stefan.karlsson at oracle.com
Wed May 27 08:48:28 UTC 2015


Hi Andreas,

On 2015-05-27 10:44, Andreas Eriksson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for looking at this.
>
> I'm getting some conflicting instructions on where the tests should be 
> placed.
> According to Stas and David Simms they should be grouped by CR.
> That was why I moved them from 
> test/runtime/jni/ToStringInInterfaceTest/ (webrev.01) to 
> test/runtime/jni/8072588/ (webrev.02).
> Should I move them back? Or move them some other place?

This was discussed some time ago and we decided to use descriptive names 
instead of CR numbers. See this page:
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/HotSpot/Naming+HotSpot+JTReg+Tests

Thanks,
StefanK

>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>
> On 2015-05-27 02:51, David Holmes wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> We don't use bug numbers to name tests any more.
>>
>> Otherwise the change seems okay.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>> On 27/05/2015 1:10 AM, Andreas Eriksson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Could a Reviewer please take a look at this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> On 2015-05-20 14:03, David Simms wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Looks good
>>>>
>>>> /David Simms
>>>>
>>>> On 20/05/15 13:11, Andreas Eriksson wrote:
>>>>> After some feedback from David and Stas the tests were moved.
>>>>> Also,mMissing copyright headers were added.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the latest webrev:
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aeriksso/8072588/webrev.02/
>>>>>
>>>>> Could a Reviewer please look at it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2015-05-06 12:52, Andreas Eriksson wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David, I've added the native test to the test suite, could you take
>>>>>> a look please?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I still need a Reviewer to take a look at this as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aeriksso/8072588/webrev.01/
>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8072588
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2015-03-20 10:14, David Simms wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks good to me (not a 'R'-eviewer)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to have your test checked in if possible. Native JNI
>>>>>>> testing has just recently been added, we can talk about the details
>>>>>>> off-list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /David Simms
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 19/03/15 17:45, Andreas Eriksson wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could someone please take a look at this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2015-03-10 17:10, Andreas Eriksson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please review this fix for a JNI issue in jni_invoke_nonstatic.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The problem is that when toString is declared as an interface
>>>>>>>>> method it still has a vtable index, not an itable index as
>>>>>>>>> jni_invoke_nonstatic expects.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This fix checks for a valid itable index instead of checking if
>>>>>>>>> the holder is an interface.
>>>>>>>>> I also moved a duplicated check for JNI_VIRTUAL to be done in one
>>>>>>>>> check instead.
>>>>>>>>> The change has been verified to fix the problem with a small JNI
>>>>>>>>> test, and has passed a jprt run with the hotspot testset.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Webrev:
>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aeriksso/8072588/webrev.00/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>



More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list