RFR: 8073331: [TESTBUG] Test for VM option file feature (VM options specified in file)
Daniel D. Daugherty
daniel.daugherty at oracle.com
Mon Sep 21 21:12:02 UTC 2015
On 9/15/15 9:08 AM, Dmitry Dmitriev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please review a new test for recently added feature: JDK-8061999
> "Enhance VM option parsing to allow options to be specified in a
> file". Also, I need a sponsor for this fix.
>
> This test verifies new "-XX:VMOptionsFile" VM Options. Several valid
> VM Options files are tested: with different number and types of
> options, empty file, file with only tab and spaces, file which
> contains properties with quotes. Also invalid situations are tested:
> not existing file, folder instead of the file, file with size greater
> than allowed, several VM option files and so on. Also, test verifies
> "last argument wins" situation: when the same option or property is
> defined several times in environment variables, on command line and in
> VM Options file. In this case option or property should get the last
> value from the most priority source. Here a priority of the
> sources(from less priority to the more priority):
> 1) Flags file
> 2) JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS environment variables
> 3) Pseudo command line from launcher(which can include VM Options file)
> 4) _JAVA_OPTIONS
>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddmitriev/8073331/webrev.00/
I was also expecting to see test/runtime/VMOptions/EnvironmentTest.java,
but perhaps that new test is coming via a different bug ID...
I don't see the following test data files in the webrev:
optionfile_with_optionfile
optionfile_with_same_optionfile
optionfile_wo_read_perm
Update: OK, I see now. These are generated by the test...
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/TestVMOptionsFile.java
L122 * Make file non-readable by modifing it permissions.:
Typo: 'it' -> 'its'.
L123: * If file support "posix" attributes,
Typo: 'support' -> 'supports'
L132: } else if (supportedAttr.contains("acl")) {
<snip>
L145: view.setAcl(acl);
Wow! Java makes ACL code look easy. This is great evolution
from POSIX 1003.6 APIs...
L157: /* Create VM option file with following parametares
"-XX:VMOptionFile=<absolute_path_to_the_VM_option_file> */
Typo: 'parametares' -> 'parameters'.
L161: /* Create VM option file with following parametares
"-XX:MinHeaFreeRatio=12
Typo: 'parametares' -> 'parameters'.
Typo: 'MinHeaFreeRatio' -> 'MinHeapFreeRatio'
L166: /* Copy valid VM option file and change it permission
to make them not accessible */
Typo: 'it' -> 'its'
Typo: 'them' -> 'it'
L261: * Check property value by examing output
L268: * Check VM Option value by examing output
Typo: 'examing' -> 'examining'
L287: /* Check that parameters are get from first VM Option
file.
L299: /* Check that parameters are get from first VM Option
file ...
L312: * Check that parameters are get from second VM Option...
L329: /* Check that parameters are get from third VM Option
file.
Typo: 'are get' -> 'are gotten'
L301: addVMParam("@" + VM_OPTION_FILE_WITH_VM_OPTION_FILE);
I'm cool with '@<optionfile>' test, but it is not a feature
that was added by 8061999.
L363: * Verify that VM Option file accept file with 64
properties and with one options on separate
Typo: 'accept file' -> 'accepts a file'
Typo: 'with one options' -> 'with one option'
L364: * lines and properties use quotes a lot.
Grammar: 'and properties use' -> 'and properties that use'
L381 * Verify that VM Option file accept file maximum allowed
Typo: 'accept file' -> 'accepts a file'
L445: * Here an order of options processing and last
argument wins:
Typo: 'Here an order' -> 'Here is the order':
L450: * In every cathegory arguments processed from left
to right and from up to down
Typo: 'cathegory' -> 'category'
L464: /* Each category define it's own properties */
Typo: "define it's own" -> "defines its own"
L566: /* Pass VM option file which not accessible(without
read permissions) */
Typo: 'which not' -> 'which is not'
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/flags_file
No comments.
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/optionFILE_2
No comments.
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/optionfile_1
No comments.
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/optionfile_3
No comments.
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/optionfile_bad_option
No comments.
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/optionfile_empty
No comments.
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/optionfile_long_property
No comments.
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/optionfile_lot_of_options_quote
No comments.
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/optionfile_only_tabsandspaces
No comments.
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/optionfile_quote
No comments.
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/optionfile_quote_max_size
No comments.
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/optionfile_unmatched_quote_1
No comments.
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/optionfile_unmatched_quote_2
No comments.
test/runtime/CommandLine/VMOptionsFile/optionfile_very_long_property
No comments.
I think all my comments are editorial. I didn't see anything wrong
with any of the test code or data files. I know there are more
test cases coming so I didn't check for completeness...
Dan
> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073331
> Feature JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8061999
> Tested: JPRT with new test
>
> Thank you,
> Dmitry
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list