(S) RFR: 8157904: Atomic::cmpxchg for jbyte is missing a fence on initial failure
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Wed Aug 24 07:36:29 UTC 2016
On 22/08/16 08:54, David Holmes wrote:
> An earlier code review noticed that the default shared implementation of
> Atomic::cmpxchg(jbyte*) was missing the required post-memory-barrier in
> case of an initial failure:
Just to satisfy my curiosity, why is the post-memory-barrier in
case of an initial failure required? Is there some specification
somewhere that I can refer to?
Thanks,
Andrew.
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list