RFR: 8149743: JVM crash after debugger hotswap with lambdas

Andreas Eriksson andreas.eriksson at oracle.com
Tue Feb 23 15:47:21 UTC 2016


On 2016-02-23 10:22, Andreas Eriksson wrote:
>
>
> On 2016-02-23 00:53, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/22/16 6:46 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>> Just noticed that this thread did not include the Serviceability
>>> aliases... JVM/TI belongs to the Serviceability team so...
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/22/16 4:44 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>>> On 2/22/16 1:28 PM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This fix looks good.   The test looks like it uses some framework 
>>>>> I don't know, in a directory that I don't usually run tests in.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have some redefinition tests in 
>>>>> hotspot/test/runtime/RedefineTests - can you write one with source 
>>>>> code there instead?
>>>>
>>>> The redefine tests in the runtime directory are in the wrong place.
>>
>> The tests in the runtime directory test runtime changes to support 
>> redefinition primarily, so are in the right place.  They are run with 
>> JPRT -testset hotspot.  They don't use these other frameworks 
>> intentionally.
>>
>>>>
>>>> JVM/TI RedefineClasses() is a debugging API and jdk/test/com/sun/jdi
>>>> is the usual place for JDI tests that exercise RedefineClasses(). If
>>>> the test is using the Java entry points (JLI/JPLIS), then those tests
>>>> belong in jdk/test/java/lang/instrument. Of course, if the test needs
>>>> to use to JDWP entry point for JVM/TI RedefineClasses(), then those
>>>> tests live in yet another location.
>>>>
>>
>> Can you or someone from serviceability team review this test then? I 
>> have no idea what it does and would prefer a test more tailored to 
>> testing the JVM functionality than jdb commands.
>
> Hi,
>
> I'll try creating a hotspot only test, but I'm not sure how to 
> reproduce this without using jdb.
>
> - Andreas

Looks like creating a hotspot only test is difficult, the problem only 
causes obvious problems (a crash) on code paths taken when using JDI/JDB 
(or JVMTI directly).

Given that the serviceability team have reviewed this I'll go ahead and 
push this with the test as-is unless you object.

Thanks,
Andreas

>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Coleen
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I linked an old bug to this, can you see if they are the same?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Coleen
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/18/16 11:11 AM, Andreas Eriksson wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please review this fix for JDK-8149743: JVM crash after debugger 
>>>>>> hotswap with lambdas
>>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8149743
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aeriksso/8149743/webrev.00/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When redefining a class to add or delete methods an array that's 
>>>>>> tracking method ordering is not updated correctly.
>>>>>> This change swaps the method ordering array between the old class 
>>>>>> being redefined and the scratch class it is being redefined into 
>>>>>> at the same point where we swap the methods and constant pool 
>>>>>> between them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>



More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list