RFR(L): 8146401: Clean up oop.hpp: add inline directives and fix header files

[David Holmes]

Hi Goetz,

On 5/01/2016 1:44 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Several recent changes cleaned up includes of oop.inline.hpp in real .hpp header file.
> Unfortunately, the 'inline' qualifier is added to the function implementations
> in oop.inline.hpp instead of to the declarations in oop.hpp. Therefore, the
> compiler can not detect failing inlines properly.
>
> This change moves the inline directive from oop.inline.hpp to oop.hpp. Also

This seems contrary to the C++ FAQ:

https://isocpp.org/wiki/faq/inline-functions

The declaration in the .hpp should not have inline, only the definition, 
which in our case is in the .inline.hpp file.

Any code that includes the .inline.hpp will have seen the definition of 
the inline function prior to its use - as long as the includes are correct.

David
-----


> it sorts the methods in oop.inline.hpp as they are sorted in oop.hpp.
>
> Further, it moves a row of calls from hpp files to inline.hpp or .cpp files.
>
> I put oop.inline.hpp into serviceUtil.hpp.  This is not clean, but this is a
> very small .hpp file and no .cpp file exists.  So I think this is acceptable.
>
> Also, I put oop.inline.hpp into jvmciJavaClasses.hpp.  I don't want to do
> bigger changes to this file in the rt repo, because jvmci is subject to
> freqent changes recently.
>
> The following methods were moved to .cpp files:
>
> ProtectionDomainCacheTable::compute_hash()
> ProtectionDomainCacheTable::index_for()
> typeArrayOopDesc::object_size()
> This is called only once outside .cpp file:
> CallSiteDepChange::CallSiteDepChange()
> This is only called in .cpp file
> ConstantPool::string_at_put()
>
> If someone considers not inlining these harmful to performance,
> I will add a new .inline.hpp file for them.
>
> Please review this change.  I please need a sponsor.
> There are no functional edits, so it should be simple to review.
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8146401-oopInline-rt/webrev.01/
>
> Best regards,
>    Goetz.
>