RFR(S) 8137314: vm crash from test java/security/Policy/SignedJar/SignedJarTest.java
George Triantafillou
george.triantafillou at oracle.com
Fri Jan 15 16:59:49 UTC 2016
Hi Harold,
Your changes look good. Thanks for fixing this.
-George
On 1/14/2016 4:00 PM, harold seigel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review this small change to fix bug 8137314
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8137314>
>
> The bug is that the JVM verifier asserts when it is called recursively
> to verify a class that has already been linked. There already exist
> checks in the verifier to prevent recursive verification of a class.
> This fix adds additional checks including one needed to prevent the
> JVM assert.
>
> The additional checks were added wherever there was a constant pool
> reference following a call that could potentially load a class.
> Loading a class causes the JVM to call back to the JDK to do a
> protection domain check which can then cause classes to get linked and
> executed. And, linking changes a class's constant pool. There are
> many places in the verifier that could load a class because
> is_assignable_from() may load a class. But, most of them encounter an
> existing recursive verification check before accessing the constant
> pool. These checks already exist after every verify_method() call and
> after every bytecode is verified.
>
> Although the problem occurred in the Jake repo, it's being fixed in
> JDK-9 because the problem is not Jigsaw specific.
>
> Open webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8137314/
>
> JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8137314
>
> The fix was tested with JCK Lang and VM tests, UTE quick and split
> verifier tests, and the hotspot, JDK vm, java/io, java/lang, and
> java/util JTreg tests, and the test case reported in this RFR.
>
> Thanks, Harold
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list