RFR 8160892: VM warning: WaitForMultipleObjects timed out

Ivan Gerasimov ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com
Thu Jul 14 22:57:22 UTC 2016


Hey!

I've updated the webrev in place at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8160892/01/webrev/

On 15.07.2016 0:31, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> On 7/14/16 12:46 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
>> Thank you David for looking into this!
>>
>> Here's the webrev updated in accordance with your and Daniel's 
>> suggestions:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8160892/01/webrev/
>
> src/os/windows/vm/os_windows.cpp
>     L3900:     bool registered = false;
>         Please consider adding a comment above this variable:
>
>         // We only attempt to register threads until a process exiting
>         // thread manages to set the process_exiting flag. Any threads
>         // that come through here after the process_exiting flag is set
>         // are unregistered and will be caught in the SuspendThread()
>         // infinite loop below.
>
Sure.  Added this comment.

>         My request is different than David's. I prefer the comment up
>         here by the 'registered' variable because that variable is
>         key for getting into the SuspendThread() infinite loop. The
>         comment also occurs before all the code paths that you have
>         trace out with the different Ept types and flags states.
>
> I'm really hoping that this is the last tweak we need to make to
> clearly comment what we're doing to alleviate this OS race.
> The number of occurrences of the underlying bug keep going down
> with every iteration so we're getting close.
>
Yes.  This is my hope too.

With kind regards,
Ivan



More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list