RFR: 8149991: Convert TraceSafepointCleanupTime to Unified Logging
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Mon Mar 7 00:32:39 UTC 2016
Looks good Rachel!
Thanks,
David
On 5/03/2016 6:22 AM, Rachel Protacio wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Thanks for the review! I've fixed the test as requested :)
>
> New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rprotacio/8149991.02/
>
> Rachel
>
> On 3/4/2016 6:38 AM, Dmitry Dmitriev wrote:
>> Hi Rachel,
>>
>> Overall looks good. Few test comments:
>> 1) Import of WeakReference seems unneeded.
>> 2) For "-Xlog:safepointcleanup=off" test case you have
>> "output.shouldNotContain("[safepointcleanup]");". Is it make sense to
>> add "output.shouldContain("[safepointcleanup]")" for case when log is
>> enabled?
>> 3) I think you should add test case for aliased option.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Dmitry
>>
>> On 03.03.2016 23:35, Rachel Protacio wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> Coming close to the end of the logging conversions for now! Here's
>>> one for TraceSafepointCleanupTime, which is turning into
>>> -Xlog:safepointcleanup=info. As it has been a product option, it is
>>> aliased in this change.
>>>
>>> To reiterate the conclusion from the TraceStartupTime conversion, I
>>> ask that as long as there are no objections to the correctness of the
>>> code, we allow this implementation for now, and I will then file a
>>> follow-up bug for possible improvements to the switch statement and
>>> TraceTime function signature situation. Since this is the only other
>>> "TraceTime" conversion, TraceTime implementation changes will be more
>>> succinctly addressable after this SafepointCleanupTime change than
>>> before it.
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8149991
>>> Open webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rprotacio/8149991.01/
>>>
>>> Sample old output:
>>>
>>> $ java -XX:+TraceSafepointCleanupTime -version
>>> java version "9-internal"
>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (fastdebug build
>>> 9-internal+0-2016-03-02-133604.rprotaci.8150083)
>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug build
>>> 9-internal+0-2016-03-02-133604.rprotaci.8150083, mixed mode)
>>> [deflating idle monitors, 0.0000088 secs]
>>> [updating inline caches, 0.0000007 secs]
>>> [compilation policy safepoint handler, 0.0000009 secs]
>>> [mark nmethods, 0.0000164 secs]
>>> [purging class loader data graph, 0.0000002 secs]
>>>
>>> Sample new output:
>>>
>>> $ java -Xlog:safepointcleanup -version
>>> java version "9-internal"
>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (fastdebug build
>>> 9-internal+0-2016-03-02-133610.rprotaci.8149991)
>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug build
>>> 9-internal+0-2016-03-02-133610.rprotaci.8149991, mixed mode)
>>> [0.348s][info][safepointcleanup] deflating idle monitors,
>>> 0.0000059 secs
>>> [0.348s][info][safepointcleanup] updating inline caches, 0.0000009
>>> secs
>>> [0.348s][info][safepointcleanup] compilation policy safepoint
>>> handler, 0.0000006 secs
>>> [0.348s][info][safepointcleanup] mark nmethods, 0.0000191 secs
>>> [0.348s][info][safepointcleanup] purging class loader data graph,
>>> 0.0000001 secs
>>>
>>>
>>> Tested using JPRT and RBT hotspot and non-colo tests.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Rachel
>>>
>>>
>>
>
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list