RFR(XS): 8165613: Convert TestKlass_test to Gtest

Kirill Zhaldybin kirill.zhaldybin at oracle.com
Fri Sep 16 17:02:30 UTC 2016


Coleen,

Thank you for comments.

Here are a new WebRev: 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kzhaldyb/webrevs/JDK-8165613/webrev.03/

Could you please let me know your opinion?

Regards, Kirill

On 15.09.2016 20:34, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>
>
> On 9/15/16 1:31 PM, Kirill Zhaldybin wrote:
>> Coleen,
>>
>> Thank you for detailed research!
>>
>> We already have test_instanceClass.cpp.
>> I added converted tests to this file.
>>
>> Here are a new WebRev: 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kzhaldyb/webrevs/JDK-8165613/webrev.02/
>
> I think this looks good except that
>
>
>     test/native/runtime/test_instanceKlass.cpp
>
> (sorry for the bold) belongs in
>
> test/native/oops/test_instanceKlass.cpp because instanceKlass.cpp is 
> in directory oops.
>
> Also, why does it sometimes have a capital I and this one has a lower 
> case i ?
>
>   TEST_VM(instanceKlass, null_symbol) {
> and your new tests:
>
> +TEST_VM(InstanceKlass, class_loader_class) {
>
> thanks,
> Coleen
>
> <javascript:print()>
>> Could you please let me know your opinion?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Regards, Kirill
>>
>>
>>
>> On 15.09.2016 19:06, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/15/16 10:53 AM, Kirill Zhaldybin wrote:
>>>> Coleen,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for reviewing the fix!
>>>>
>>>> Here are a new WebRev: 
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kzhaldyb/webrevs/JDK-8165613/webrev.01/
>>>>
>>>> I changed the test name and moved it to the appropriate location.
>>>>
>>>> Could you please let me know your opinion?
>>>
>>> I think I figured out the point of this test.  It's apparently 
>>> trying to add a test for the 
>>> InstanceKlass::is_class_loader_instance_klass() function.
>>>
>>> So I have to admit that I was wrong to have you move it to 
>>> systemDictionary, since the function that it's trying to test is in 
>>> InstanceKlass, so it should belong to InstanceKlass.
>>>
>>>    28 TEST_VM(SystemDictionary, class_loader_class) {
>>>    29   Klass* klass = SystemDictionary::ClassLoader_klass();
>>>    30   ASSERT_TRUE(klass->is_instance_klass());
>>>    31   ASSERT_TRUE(InstanceKlass::cast(klass)->is_class_loader_instance_klass());
>>>    32 }
>>>    33
>>>    34 TEST_VM(SystemDictionary, string_klass) {
>>>    35   Klass* klass = SystemDictionary::String_klass();
>>>    36   ASSERT_TRUE(!klass->is_instance_klass() ||
>>>    37           !InstanceKlass::cast(klass)->is_class_loader_instance_klass());
>>>
>>> Since SystemDictionary::x_klass() now returns InstanceKlass, this can be written as:
>>>
>>>    28 TEST_VM(InstanceKlass, class_loader_class) {
>>>    29   InstanceKlass* klass = SystemDictionary::ClassLoader_klass();
>>>    31   ASSERT_TRUE(klass->is_class_loader_instance_klass());
>>>    32 }
>>>    33
>>>    34 TEST_VM(InstanceKlass, string_klass) {
>>>    35   InstanceKlass* klass = SystemDictionary::String_klass();
>>>    36   ASSERT_TRUE(!klass->is_class_loader_instance_klass());
>>> And then add a comment that this is the point of the test since I 
>>> had to go back to history to figure this out. I'm sorry that I 
>>> didn't research this when I made my original comments. Thanks, Coleen
>>>> Thank you. Regards, Kirill On 12.09.2016 15:28, Coleen Phillimore 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> This looks good but I'm confused about something: 
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kzhaldyb/webrevs/JDK-8165613/webrev.00/test/native/oops/test_klass.cpp.html 
>>>>>   28 TEST_VM(SystemDictionary, class_loader_class) { It seems like 
>>>>> making the tests test the SystemDictionary is more appropriate 
>>>>> than InstanceKlass, which I think this does.  If so, can you move 
>>>>> the test file to the directory 
>>>>> test/native/classfile/test_systemDictionary.cpp (or whatever the 
>>>>> convention is), if it exists? Thanks, Coleen On 9/12/16 8:15 AM, 
>>>>> Kirill Zhaldbybin wrote:
>>>>>> Robert, Thank you for review! Regards, Kirill On 09/12/2016 11:35 
>>>>>> AM, Robbin Ehn wrote:
>>>>>>> Looks good. Thanks! /Robbin (not a 'R'eviewer) On 09/08/2016 
>>>>>>> 04:48 PM, Kirill Zhaldybin wrote:
>>>>>>>> Dear all, Could you please review this fix for 8165613? WebRev: 
>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kzhaldyb/webrevs/JDK-8165613/webrev.00/ 
>>>>>>>> CR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165613 Thank you. 
>>>>>>>> Regards, Kirill 


More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list