RFR(S): 8160064: StackWalker implementation added logging option without using UL

[David Holmes]

Hi Daniel,

On 28/09/2016 7:08 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 28/09/16 00:40, David Holmes wrote:
>>>> I also query why all the logging entries are at the trace level?
>>>
>>> It seems like this could generate quite a bit of output => trace.
>>
>> I continue to have issues with this. I really believe that for any given
>> log level there should be info, debug, and trace depending on the level
>> of detail for that particular logging flag. So for any given flag info
>> should always produce some output. Otherwise you have no way to know
>> what level you need to set to get any output.
>
> In the case of stack walking I don't think we want to see
> anything at the info level.

I don't subscribe to the "lets turn on all info logging" mode of 
operation. I expect people to turn on the logging they are interested in.

Cheers,
David

> These traces are going to be very verbose and for debugging
> purpose only.
>
> best regards,
>
> -- daniel